摘要
目的评价卡培他滨(CAP)联合奥沙利铂(L—OHP)或伊立替康(CPT-11)治疗转移性结直肠癌的疗效及安全性。方法收治转移性结直肠癌患者66例,其中用CAP+L—OHP方案治疗者31例,CAP+CPT-11方案治疗者35例,2组均接受4周期化疗,分析2组患者临床有效率及化疗相关药物不良反应。结果CAP+L—OPH组客观缓解率(ORR)为19.4%,CAP+CPT-11组为20.0%,差别无统计学意义(P〉0.05);CAP+CPT-11组与CAP+L—OHP组整体Ⅲ-Ⅳ度不良反应发生率分别为51.6%和60.0%,差别无统计学意义(P〉0.05),但CAP+CPT-11组腹泻的发生率为22.9%,显著高于L—OHP组3.2%(P〈0.05)。结论CAP联合L—OHP或CPT-11治疗转移性结直肠癌临床疗效无明显差别,但CAP+CPT-11组严重腹泻发生率较高。
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin (L -OHP) or irinotecan ( CPT -11 ) combined with capecitabine (CAP) in the treatment of metastasis colorectal carcinoma.Methods Sixty -six patients with metastasis colorectal carcinoma were recruited in this study.There were 31 cases in CAP plus L -OHP group and 35 sub-jects in CAP plus CPT -11 group.All of the included cases were treated with 4 cycles of chemotherapy.The clinical efficacy and chemotherapy related side effects were compared between the two groups .Results The objective response rate (ORR) were 19.4% and 20.0% in the CAP plus L -OHP and CAP plus CPT -11 group respectively without statistical difference (P 〉0.05).The grade Ⅲ to Ⅳ adverse reactions in the CAP plus CPT -11 group and CAP plus L -OHP group were 51.6% and 60.0%, without statistical differences in two groups (P 〉0.05) .But diarrhea incidence in the CAP plus CPT -11 group (22.9%) was much higher than that in the CAP plus L -OHP group (3.2%) (P 〈0.05). Conclusion There was no statistical difference on clinical efficacy between the two chemotherapy regimens, but there is a higher incidence of serious diarrhea in CAP plus CPT -11 regimen.
出处
《中国临床药理学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2014年第10期907-908,918,共3页
The Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
基金
福建省自然科学基金资助项目(2013J0271)