期刊文献+

国际关系的现实主义维度--和平共处五项原则的立场探究 被引量:6

Realistic Dimension of International Relations:A Study on the Stance of Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence
原文传递
导出
摘要 和平共处五项原则的核心指向是国家的独立与平等。从该原则体系出现之时,就代表了中国政府对于国际关系与国际法的务实态度,代表了中国对于国际法的现实主义立场。借鉴心理学家马斯洛的需求层次理论,可以认为,国家的需求也是分层次的,而对于独立与和平共处的需求最为关键,是国际社会进一步发展的前提和基础,因而和平共处五项原则仍然具有强大的生命力。 The core essence of the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence is the independence and equality of states.They have represented the realistic attitude of Chinese government on international relations and international law since they were created. It may be concluded,by referring to Maslow's hierarchy of needs,which the needs of states are also in hierarchy. Independence and peaceful coexistence are both in the basic level,fundamental for states when seeking for further development. Therefore,the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence are still of great vitality.
作者 何志鹏 孙璐
出处 《吉林大学社会科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第6期123-130,175,共8页 Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition
基金 国家社会科学基金后期资助项目(13FFX037) 吉林大学青年学术领袖项目
关键词 和平共处 国家利益 国际法 现实主义 peaceful coexistence national interest international law realism
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1"It is true the slogan has become central only since about 1956.
  • 2At that time it took off from the Pancha Shila, the five principles which had been proclaimed in the Sino-Indian Pact of 1954 and expanded in the Bandung Declaration of 1955.
  • 3" Lipson L Peaceful coexis- tence. Law and Contemporary Problems, 1964, 29:871 -881.
  • 4Fifield R H. Notes and comments: The five principles of peaceful co-ex- istence. American Journal of International Law, 1958, 52 : 504.
  • 5何志鹏.《用务实理念推动国际合作》,《人民日报》,2014年6月24日,第3版.
  • 6《中华人民共和国政府关于苏联政府1956年10月30日宣言的声明》,《人民日报》1956年11月2日.
  • 7McWhinney E. Soviet and western international law and the cold war in the era of bipolarity. Canadian Yearbook of International Law, 1963, 40 : 42 - 46.
  • 8Patomaki H. After international relations : Critical realism and the (re) construction of world politics. London : Rout- ledge, 2002.
  • 9何志鹏,高玥.作为国际法研究方法的批判现实主义[J].法制与社会发展,2014,20(3):148-164. 被引量:9
  • 10Schwenke C. Reclaiming value in international development: The moral dimensions of development policy and practice in poor countries. Santa Barbara: Praeger, 2008.

二级参考文献77

共引文献26

同被引文献123

引证文献6

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部