期刊文献+

企业异质性环境实践方式与绩效关系的实证研究 被引量:10

Research on Corporate Heterogenic Environmental Practices and Environmental and Financial Performance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从企业环境实践行为日益普遍与自然环境持续恶化的现实矛盾出发,研究了差异性环境实践方式对企业环境绩效和财务绩效的影响,以及实施于不同层面环境实践对上述差异的贡献。通过对2010年沪深两市发行独立报告的上市公司研究发现,实质性环境实践方式与环境绩效正相关,与财务绩效负相关;象征性环境实践方式与之相反,负相关于环境绩效,正相关于财务绩效。同时,技术层面的环境实践行为,无论实质还是象征都优于制度层面对绩效改变的贡献。 Starting with the illogical reality that with a growing number of corporate involving in environmental protection, the nature environment is getting worse, this paper studied the effects of heterogenic environmental practices on corporate performance, and the different contribution from technical update or institution improvement. It choosed the listed companies that published social, environmental or sustainable reports in 2010 as a sample. Through content analysis, it found that substantive approach will benefit the CEP, while harm the CFP; symbolic approach positively affect the CFP, and negative correlated to CEP. Meanwhile , environmental practices implement in technical system, whether substantive or symbolic, contribute more to the performance changing than that in institutional system.
作者 缑倩雯 蔡宁
出处 《软科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第11期15-19,共5页 Soft Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71173183)
关键词 环境实践 实质性方式 象征性方式 环境绩效 财务绩效 environmental practices substantive approach symbolic approach corporate environmental performance corporate financial performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Russo M V, Harrison N S. Organizational Design and Environmen-tal Performance.. Clues From Electronics Industry [ J]. Academy ofManagement Journal, 2005,48(4) :582 -593.
  • 2Rodrigue M, Magnan M, Cho C H. Is Environmental GovernanceSubstantive or Symbolic. An Empirical Investigationf J]. Journal ofBusiness Ethics, 2012,1 -23.
  • 3Bragdon J, Marlin H J. Is pollution profitable[ J]. Risk Manage-ment, 1972,19(4) : 9 -18.
  • 4Porter M. America's Green Strategy[ J] . Business and the Environ-ment. 1996:33 -35.
  • 5周鹏,张宏志.利益相关者间的谈判与企业治理结构[J].经济研究,2002,37(6):55-62. 被引量:103
  • 6Suddaby R, Greenwood R. Rhetorical Strategies of Legitimacy[ J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 2005 ,50( 1) :35 -67.
  • 7Wang T, Bansai P. Social Responsibility in New Ventures: Profi-ting From A Long - term Orientation [ J ]. Strategic ManagementJournal, 2012,33(10) :1135 -1153.
  • 8因内斯.马可-斯达德勒,佩雷斯-卡斯特里罗_大卫.信息经济学引论[M].管毅平译.上海:上海财经大学出版社,2004.
  • 9黄珺,周春娜.股权结构、管理层行为对环境信息披露影响的实证研究——来自沪市重污染行业的经验证据[J].中国软科学,2012(1):133-143. 被引量:110
  • 10Ashforth B E, Gibbs B W. The Double - edged of OrganizationalLegitimation [ J ]. Organization Science, 1990,1(2) : 177 - 194.

二级参考文献133

共引文献517

同被引文献130

引证文献10

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部