期刊文献+

感应离子电流盐渍腌菜工艺研究 被引量:3

Vegetable Salting Process Based on Inductive Ion Current
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用交变磁通在盐渍液回路体系产生的感应电动势驱动Na^+、Cl^-形成离子电流,对4种常见腌菜进行了快速盐渍加工。选取盐渍液质量分数、处理时间和孔隙率为影响因素,考察了经过该方法浸渍处理的4种蔬菜的渗盐量并通过响应面分析建立了针对孔隙率为5.4%~8.2%的蔬菜渗盐量预测模型。结果表明:随盐渍液质量分数的增加体系磁能转换为电能的效率增高,蔬菜的渗盐量增大。对厚度为24 mm且孔隙率在6%的蔬菜,采用离子电流浸渍处理后最快可在30 min时使蔬菜的渗盐量达到5%左右,渗盐量随盐渍液质量分数和孔隙率的增大呈现增加的趋势。选取孔隙率为7.3%的茄子作为实测验证对象,通过数据拟合表明该模型能较好地预测经过离子电流浸渍处理后蔬菜的盐分含量。 This study presents a new impregnation technique for brining four kinds of vegetables based on Na^+ and Cl^- ion current generated by the electromagnetic induction.Saline concentration,processing time and porosity were identified as main variables,which influenced pickling efficiency.Based on the principle of Box-Benhnken central composite design,response surface analysis was applied to obtain the regression model to estimate the salt content of vegetables in the porosity range from 5.4% ~ 8.2%.The results showed that the efficiency of magnetic energy converting to electrical energy increased along with increasing the concentration of solution.With a thickness of 24 mm and a porosity of more than 6% of the vegetables tissue,the sample were immersed in saline solutions subjected to ion current under the influence of the static magnetic field for 30 min,the salt content reached 5% approximately.The regression model provided reliable prediction of the salt content in eggplant with the porosity of 7.3%.
出处 《农业机械学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第10期238-244,共7页 Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery
基金 '十二五'国家科技支撑计划资助项目(2012BAD37B01)
关键词 感应离子电流 蔬菜 盐渍 孔隙率 渗盐量 Inductive ion current Vegetable Salting Porosity Salt content
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Barat J M, Grau R, Ibanez J B, et al. Post-salting studies in Spanish cured ham manufacturing. Time reduction by using brine thawing-salting [J]. Meat Science, 2005, 69(2): 201 -208.
  • 2Li J R, Hsieh Y H. Traditional Chinese food technology and cuisine [ J ]. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nnutrition, 2004, 13(2) :147-155.
  • 3Chiralt A, Fito P, Barat J M, et al. Use of vacuum impregnation in food salting process [ J]. Journal of Food Engineering, 2001, 49(2 -3): 141 -151.
  • 4王晓拓,高振江,曾贞,刘博.脉动压腌制双孢菇工艺参数优化[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(7):282-287. 被引量:11
  • 5章银良,夏文水.海鳗盐渍过程的动力学和热力学[J].农业工程学报,2007,23(2):223-228. 被引量:13
  • 6Alino R, Grau R, Fernandez-Sanchez A, et al. Influence of brine concentration on swelling pressure of pork meet throughout salting [J]. Meat Science, 2010, 86(3): 600 -606.
  • 7Kaewmanee T, Benjakul B, Visessanguan W. Changes in chemical composition, physics properties and microstructure of duck egg as influenced by salting [J]. Food Chemistry, 2009, 112(3) : 560 -569.
  • 8Mcfeeters R F, Fleming H P, Thompson R L. Malic and citric acids in picking cucumbers [J]. Journal of Food Science, 1982, 47(6) : 1859 - 1865.
  • 9Schulze B, Peth P, Hubbermann E M, et al. The influence of vacuum impregnation on the fortification of apple parenchyma with quereetin derivatives in combination with pore structure X-ray analysis[ J ]. Journal of Food Engineering, 2012, 109 (3) : 308 - 387.
  • 10Sanzana S, Gras M L, Vidal-Brot6ns D. Functional foods enriched in Aloe vera. Effects of vacuum impregnation and temperature on the respiration rate and the respiratory quotient of some vegetables [J]. Procedia Food Science, 2011 , 1: 1528 -1533.

二级参考文献33

共引文献29

同被引文献46

  • 1李全宏,赵雅松,蔡同一,李淑燕.鲜切马铃薯褐变抑制效果研究[J].食品科学,2005,26(9):92-95. 被引量:48
  • 2高蕙文,陈晓红,吕欣,姜梅,董明盛.真空浸渍法制备固定化乳酸菌苹果粒的研究[J].食品科学,2006,27(7):155-158. 被引量:8
  • 3Perez-Cabrera L, GJiafe? M' Ghiralt A, et d, Effectivenesa of antibrowning agents applied by vacuum impregnation on minimallyprocessed pear[J]. LWT= Food Science and Technology, 2011,44( 10) : 2273 -2280.
  • 4Hironaka K, Kikqphi M , Koaze H , et al, Ascorbic acid enrichment of whole potato tuber by vacuum-impregnation [ J ]. FoodChemistry, 2011, 127(3) j 1114-1118.
  • 5Vargas M, Chiralt A, Albors A, et gj. Effect of chitosan-based edible coatings applied by vacuum impregnation on qualitypreservation pf fresh-put carrot[ J], Foatharveat Biology and Technology, 2009 , 51(2) : 263 -271.
  • 6Krasaelcoppt W, Suth&nwong B. Yaouwm impregnation of probiotics in fruit pieces and their survival during refrigerated storage[ J].Kasetsart Jpurnal-Ngtural Science, 2008. 42: 723 -731.
  • 7MQ^ga M J, Mor^gft FUq P J, et al, Effect of vacuum impregnation with calcium lactate on the osmotic dehydration kinetics andquality qf osmodehydr^tp4 grapefruit[ J], Jqurnal of Food Engineering, 2009, 90(3): 372 -379.
  • 8Gras M L, Vidal D, 3etarf!t N, et al. Calcium fortification of vegetables by vacuum impregnation: interactions with cellular matrix[ J].Journal of Food Engineering, 2QQ3, 36(2) i 279 - 284.
  • 9Lin D S, Leonard S W * Ledpper G, et al. Retention of fortified vitamin E and sensory quality of fresh-cut pears by vacuumimprepatifm with hpn?y[ J], Jaumal of Food Science, 2006, 71(7) : S553 -S559.
  • 10Wright J J, Vftn Oer Bekefl S, The Hall effect in a flowing electrolyte[ J]. American Journal of Physics, 1972,40(2) : 245 -247.

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部