期刊文献+

基于GLUE和标准Bayesian方法对TOPMODEL模型的参数不确定性分析 被引量:3

Uncertainty analyses of parameters in TOPMODEL model based on GLUE and Standard Bayesian method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前,水文模型不确定性的量化问题在水文研究中受到很大关注,在一些文章中提到了许多不确定性量化的方法,其中,GLUE方法和标准Bayesian方法是两种最常用的方法。主要讨论这两种方法在研究TOPMODEL模型时计算有效性和不同之处.通过用GLUE和标准Bayesian方法估计TOPMODEL模型参数的不确定性和模拟的不确定性,对这两种方法的结果进行评价,并讨论产生不同的原因,研究的主要结果为:(1)由Bayesian方法得到的参数后验分布比GLUE方法得到的离散型小。(2)给定GLUE中阈值(=0.8)的情况下,由Bayesian方法得到模拟流量的不确定性置信区间与GLUE方法得到的很接近。 Quantification of uncertainties in the hydrological models has attracted much attention in the hydrologic research field in recent years.Many methods have been reported for the uncertainty quantification,of which GLUE and standard Bayesian method are the two most commonly used methods.This paper focuses on the computational efficiencies and differences of the two methods in the study of TOPMODEL model.The uncertainties of model parameters and simulation were evaluated using the GLUE and standard Bayesian method,which showed that(1)the parameter posterior distributions generated by the Bayesian method are slightly less scattered than those generated by the GLUE method; and(2) the confidence intervals calculated by the Bayesian method and the GLUE method are very similar when the threshold value(=0.8)is given in GLUE.
出处 《南水北调与水利科技》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第6期44-48,共5页 South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目"冰冻圈变化及其影响研究"第六课题"寒区流域水文过程综合模拟与预估研究"(2013CBA01806) 国家自然科学基金面上项目(41371049) 重点实验室开放基金项目(IWHR-SKL-201213) 江苏省研究生培养创新工程(CXLX13-239)
关键词 GLUE Bayesian方法 TOPMDE模型 不确定性 敏感参数 拟合 置信区间 GLUE Bayesian method TOPMODEL model uncertainty sensitive parameter fitting confidence interval
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Kuczera G,Parent E.Monte Caro assessment of parameter uncertainty in conceptual catchment models:the Metropolis algorithm[J].Joumal of Hydrology,1998,211:69-85.
  • 2Jiang T,Chen Y D,Xu C Y,et al.Development and testing of a simple physically-based distributed rainfall-runoff model for storm runoff simulation in humid forested forested basin[J].Journal of Hydrology,2007,336:334-346.
  • 3Refsgaard J C,Storm B.Construction calibration and validation of hydrological models.In:Abbott,M.B,Distributed Hydrological Modelling[J].Water Science and Technology Library,1996,22:41-54.
  • 4Xu C Y,Tunemar L,Chen Y D,et al.Evaluation of seasonal and spatial variations of conceptual hydrological model sensitivity to precipitation data errors[J].Journal of Hydrology,2006,324:80-93.
  • 5Engeland K,Xu C Y,Gottschalk Lars.Assessing Uncertainties in a conceptual water balance model using Bayesian methodology[J].Hydrological Sciences Journal,2005,50(1):45-63.
  • 6Marshall L,Nott D,Sharma A.Towards dynamic catchment codelling:a Bayesian hierarchical modeling framework[J].Hydrological Processes,2007,21:847-861.
  • 7Kavetski D,Franks S,Kuczera G.Confronting input uncertainty in environmental modeling[J].In:Gupta H.V,Sorooshian S,Rousseau A.N,Turcotte R.Calibration of Watershed Models.AGU Water Science and Applications Series,Duan,2002,49-68.
  • 8Chowdhury S,Sharma A.Mitigating parameter bias in hydrological modeling due to uncertainty in covariates[J].Journal of Hydrology,2007,340:197-204.
  • 9Freer J,Baven K J,Ambroise B.Bayesian estimation of uncertainty in runoff prediction and the value of data:an application of the GLUE approach[J].Water Resources Research,1996,32:2161-2173.
  • 10Beven K J,Feer J.Equifinality,data assimilation,and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology[J].Journal of Hydrology,2001,249(1-4):11-29.

共引文献1

同被引文献33

引证文献3

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部