摘要
目的研究并分析采用专家型髓内钉与钢板两种方法治疗胫骨下段骨折的临床效果。方法在我院选取17例胫骨下段骨折患者,并随机分为采用专家型髓内钉进行治疗的观察组和采用钢板进行治疗的对照组。结果对两组骨折患者随访1－2年,平均1.5年。统计发现观察组患者的优良率（88.89%）显著高于对照组患者的优良率（62.50%）;而对照组骨折患者的手术时间和住院时间以及术中出血量均显著低于观察组患者,两组间存在差异。结论采用专家型髓内钉进行治疗胫骨下段骨折的临床效果较对照组显著,是目前最常用于胫骨下段骨折的治疗手段。
Objective To study and analyze the use of expert steel intramedullary nail with the lower tibia fracture clinical effects of two methods for treatment. Methods 17 cases in our hospital selected the lower tibia fracture patients were randomly divided into intramedullary nail using expert observation group were treated using steel for treatment and control groups. Results The patients were followed for two fractures of 1-2 years, with an average of 1.5 years. Statistics found that the observation group were excellent rate（88.89%） was significantly higher in patients with good rate（62.50%）; while the control group of patients with fracture surgery and hospitalization time and blood loss were significantly lower than that observed in patients, there are differences between the two groups. Conclusion Experts intramedullary nail for treatment of tibial fractures of the lower end of the clinical effect was significantly higher than the control group, is currently the most commonly used treatment for fractures of the lower tibia.
出处
《中国卫生产业》
2014年第26期39-40,42,共3页
China Health Industry
