跨太平洋伙伴关系协议与美国贸易保护的新路径被引量：3

Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement and New American Protectionism

下载PDF

导出

摘要从贸易限制的视角,依据国际关系中的现实主义和自由主义理论,提出两大核心假设:构建中的TPP条款为因变量,成文后的TPP条款为自变量,二者皆为美国贸易保护提供了新路径。选取核心议题里的知识产权、竞争政策、劳工和环境规则,水平与交叉议题上的监管一致议题作为主要研究对象,分析作为因变量的TPP条款提供贸易保护的方法,它们分别是:白金标准、体系竞争、主协议条款且有争端解决机制、监管机制规则。尝试用中美两国在WTO发生的贸易摩擦案例分析并预测作为自变量的TPP条款对于中美贸易的影响,预期未来中美两国在服务贸易领域以及新议题领域摩擦加剧,美国在TPP制定的贸易规则对我国贸易方式影响深远。 The arguments of Liberal and Realistic institutionalism provide paths for American protectionism in the Trans - Pacific Partnership Agreement （TPP）. From the point of realism, the articles of TPP now under negotiation are dependent variables for American protectionism and the written articles of TPP are independent variables. The authors of the present paper have selected some issues under negotiation to analyze their relationship with American protectionism. Most of them are connected with unfair trade or protecting American jobs. And they have analyzed the possible trade frictions between China and America if TPP is implemented.

作者郭增栋李淑俊

机构地区山东师范大学历史与社会发展学院山东财经大学国际经济与贸易学院

出处《山东师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）》 2014年第5期98-111,共14页 Journal of Shandong Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)

关键词跨太平洋伙伴关系协议美国贸易保护国际机制中美贸易摩擦 Trans -Pacific Partnership Agreement （TPP） American protectionism international regime Sino -U. S. trade frictions

分类号 F757.12 [经济管理—国际贸易]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献44

1Cletus C. Coughlin, K. Alec Chrystal, Geoffrey E. Wood," Protectionist Trade Policies : A Survey of Theory, Evidence, and Rati- onale", in Jeffry A. Frieden and David A Lake, eds. , International Political Economy: Perspectives on Global Power and Wealth, Beijing: Peking University Press, 2003, p. 305.
2Office of the United States Trade Representative, "Outlines of the Trans -Pacific Partnership Agreement", Nov. 12, :2011. bttp :// www. ustr. gov/about - us/press - office/fact - sheets/201 l/november/outlines - trans - pacific - partnership - agreement.
3[美]I．M．戴斯勒著，王恩冕,于少蔚译.《美国贸易政治》，北京：中国市场出版社，2006年版，第14页，第11页，第16页,第3页.
4Stephen Krasner, "Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables", International Organization, Vo1.36, 1982, p. 186.
5Office of the United States Trade Representative, "Trans -Paeifie Partnership Leaders Statement", Nov. 12, 2011. http ://www. us- tr. gov/about - us/press - office/press - releases/2011/november/trans - pacific - partnership - leaders - statement.
6Mireya Solis, "Last train for Asia - Pacific Integration? U.S. Objectives in the TPP Negotiations, " Waseda University Organization for Japan - US Studies Working Paper No. 201102, July 27 2011.
7Robert Keohane, After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984, p. 65.
8[美]罗伯特·0·基欧汉.《局部全球化世界中的治理:2000年美国政治学会主席讲演》,罗伯特·0·基欧汉,门洪华编,门洪华译.《局部全球化世界中的自由主义、权力与治理》,北京:北京大学出版社,2004年,第286-289页.
9[美]罗伯特·O·基欧汉.《对国际机制的需求》,罗伯特·0·基欧汉,门洪华编,门洪华,译.《局部全球化世界中的自由主义、权力与治理》,北京:北京大学出版社,2004年,第139-140页.
10John Ravenhill, "Extending the TPP: The Political Economy of Multilateralization in Asia," Paper for Asia Pacific Trade Econo- mists" Conference, ARTNeT, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand, 2 - 3 Novem- ber, 2009, p. 23. http://tfctn, org. sg/pdf/T1Y/papers/Ravenhill% 20ARTNeT. pdf.

共引文献1

1曲博.国际经济合作的国内制度分析[J].世界经济与政治,2007(1):61-68. 被引量：10

同被引文献39

1盛斌.美国视角下的亚太区域一体化新战略与中国的对策选择——透视“泛太平洋战略经济伙伴关系协议”的发展[J].南开学报（哲学社会科学版）,2010(4):70-80. 被引量：89
2车丕照,杜明.WTO协定中对发展中国家特殊和差别待遇条款的法律可执行性分析[J].北大法律评论,2005,6(2):287-304. 被引量：9
3李健.WTO体制下的特殊和差别待遇制度[J].四川师范大学学报（社会科学版）,2007,34(1):28-33. 被引量：4
4Robert E.Hudee,Developing Countries in the GATT Legal System,Gower Publishing Company Limited,1987,p.23.
5Uche Ewelukwa,“Special and Differential Treatment in International Trade Law:A Concept in Search of Content”,79North Dakota Law Review(2003).
6Frank J.Garcia,“Trade and Inequality:Economic Justice and the Developing World”,21 Michigan Journal of International Law(2004).
7Ndiva Kofele-Kale,“The Principle of Preferential Treatment in the Law of GATT:Toward Achieving the Objective of An Equitable World Trading System”,18 California Western International Law Journal(1988);Abdulqawi?A.Yusuf,“Differential and More Favourable Treatment:The GATT Enabling Clause”,18 Journal of World Trade Law(1980);Kimon Nicolaides,“Preferences for Developing Countries:A Critique”,19 Journal of World Trade Law(1985).
8Sonia E.Rolland,“Redesigning the Negotiation Process at the WTO”,13 Journal of International Economic Law(2010);Christian Barry and Sanjay G.Reddy,Symposium,“Global Justice:Poverty,Human Rights,and Responsibilities:Panel,2:Global Justice and International Economic Arrangements:International Trade and Labor Standards:A Proposal for Linkage”,39Cornell International Law Journal(2006).
9Sonia E.Rolland,“Redesigning the Negotiation Process at the WTO”,13 Journal of International Economic Law(2010).
10T.M.Franck,Fairness in International Law and Institutions,2nd,ed.,Clarendon Press,1995,p.18.