期刊文献+

^(18)FDG PET对乳腺癌术后肿瘤标志物升高患者的价值

The value of ^(18)FDG PET in the follow-up of breast cancer with elevated level of tumor markers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨18FDG-PET对乳腺癌术后肿瘤标志物升高患者的价值。方法对56例乳腺癌术后肿瘤标志物(CA153和/或CEA)升高患者进行18FDG-PET显像,所得结果与最后诊断比较,计算18FDG-PET的效能。结果 40/56例病人共发现18FDG放射性增高灶197个,经组织病理(手术或活检)、详细常规影像学检查及临床随访至少9个月,最后确定是否复发或转移。18FDG-PET真阳性34例,假阳性6例,真阴性13例,假阴性3例。18FDG-PET探测乳腺癌术后复发或转移的敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为91.9%(34/37)、68.4%(13/19)、83.9(47/56)、85.0%(34/40)、81.3%(13/16)。结论 18FDG PET对乳腺癌术后肿瘤标志物升高患者再分期具有重要意义,进一步影响临床管理。 Objective To evaluate the value of18 FDG PET in the follow-up of breast cancer with elevated level of tumor markers. Methods Fifty six breast cancer patients after surgery with elevated level of tumor markers(CA153 and/or CEA) were enrolled to undergo18 FDG PET. Result In 40 out of 56 patients,the18 FDG PET detected 197 sites of increased metabolic activity.These findings were confirmed by histopathology,conventional imaging examination and follow-up at least 9 months. The18 FDG PET scan was true-positive in 34 patients,false-positive in 6 patients,false-negative in 3 patients,and true-negative in 13 patients.Sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,negative predictive value,and accuracy were 91.9%,68.4%,83.9%,85.0%,81.3%,respectively. Conclusion The 18 FDG PET scan plays an important role in restaging breast cancer patients with rising tumor markers,with a consequent significant clinical impact on further management in these patients.
出处 《中华保健医学杂志》 2014年第4期293-295,共3页 Chinese Journal of Health Care and Medicine
关键词 乳腺癌 复发 转移 18^FDG PET 肿瘤标志物 Breast cancer Recurrence Metastasis 18^FDG PET Tumor markers
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Evangelista L,Baretta Z,Vinante L,et al. Tumour markers and FDG PET/CT for prediction of disease relapse in patients with breast cancer[J]. Eur J Nucl M ed Mol Imaging, 2011,38 (2):293- 301.
  • 2Yerushalmi R,Tyldesley S,Kenneeke H,et al. Tumor markers in metastatic breast cancer subtypes: frequency of elevation and correlation with outcome[J]. Ann Oncol,2012,23(2):338-345.
  • 3Gion M,Boracehi P,Dittadi R,et al. Prognostic role of serum CA153 in 362 node-negative breast cancers. An old player for a new game[J]. Eur J Cancer,2008,38(4) : 1181-1188.
  • 4Evangelista L, Cervino AR, Ghiotto C, et al. Tumor marker-guided PET in breast cancer patients-a recipe for a perfect wedding:a systematic literature review and meta-analysis [J]. Clin Nuel Med,2012,37(5) :467-474.
  • 5Hang AR, Shcmidt GP, Klingenstein A, et al. F-I 8-fluoro-2-de- oxyglueose positron emission tomography/eomputed tomography in the follow-up of breast cancer with elevated levels of tumor markers [ J ]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2007,31 (4) : 629-634.
  • 6Champion L, Brain E, Giraudet AL, et al. Breast cancer recurrence diagnosis suspected on tumor marker rising: Value of whole-body 18FDG-PET/CT imaging and impact on patient management [J]. Cancer,20l 1,117(8): 1621-1629.
  • 7陈建伟,王杰,刘标,丁其勇,黄庆娟.PET/CT与胸部诊断CT在乳腺癌术后随访中的比较[J].南京医科大学学报(自然科学版),2010,30(2):195-198. 被引量:5

二级参考文献13

  • 1Piperkova E,Raphael B,Ahinyay ME,et al. Impact of PET/CT in comparison with same day contrast enhanced CT in breast cancer management [J]. Clin Nucl Med, 2007,32(6) :429-434.
  • 2Eubank WB,Mankoff DA. Evolving role of positron emission tomography in breast cancer imaging[J]. Semin Nucl Med, 2005,35(2) :84-99.
  • 3Lavayssiere R,Cabee AE,Filmont JE. Positron emission tomography (PET) and breast cancer in clinical practice [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2009,69( 1 ) :50-58.
  • 4Kuru B,Camlibel M,Dinc S,et al. Prognostic factors for survival in breast cancer patients who developed distant metastasis subsequent to definitive surgery[J]. Singapore Med J, 2008,49 ( 11 ) : 904-911.
  • 5Eubank WB,Mankoff DA,Takasugi J,et al. ^18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to detect mediastinal or internal mammary metastases in breast cancer[J].J Clin Oncol,2001,19(15):3516-3523.
  • 6Groheux D,Moretti JL,Baillet G,et al. Effect of ^18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in patients with clinical stage Ⅱ and Ⅲ breast cancer[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2008,71 (3) :695-704.
  • 7Weir L,Worsley D,Bernstein V. The value of FDG positron emission tomography in the management of patients with breast cancer[J]. Breast J,2005,11 (3):204- 209.
  • 8Fuster D, Duch J, Paredes P,et al. Preoperative staging of large primary breast cancer with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography compared with conventional imaging procedures [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2008,26 (29) : 4746-4751.
  • 9Heusner TA,Kuemmel S,Umutlu L,et al. Breast cancer staging in a single session:whole-body PET/CT mammography[J]. J Nucl Med,2008,49(8) : 1215-1222.
  • 10Lim HS, Yoon W, Chung TW, et al. FDG PET/CT for the detection and evaluation of breast diseases:usefulness and limitations [J]. Radiographics, 2007,27 (Suppl 1 ) : S197-213.

共引文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部