期刊文献+

公共基础设施、产业区位与区域经济增长研究

Public Infrastructure,Industrial Location and Regional Economic Growth
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文沿袭空间经济学研究范式,对LS模型进行拓展后深入研究了改善公共基础设施对产业区位和区域经济增长的影响,研究结论表明:当存在拥挤效应时,改善落后地区和发达地区之间公共基础设施的公共政策将经济从经济增长率高、产业集中度低和收入差异小的均衡推向经济增长率低、产业集中度高和收入差异大的均衡;解决市场失灵问题比改善公共基础设施更有效,因为改善区域公共基础设施进一步放大了市场失灵的负面效应,这说明促进技术扩散并降低拥挤成本效应的政策才是最优区域经济政策。 Following the research paradigm of spatial economics, an in-depth study based on the expansion of LS model has been done on the effect of the public infrastructure improvement on industrial location and regional economic growth. The conclusion of the study shows that (1) when there is the congestion effect, public developed areas will move pol the icies aiming at improving public infrastructure of backward areas and economy from the equilibrium of high economic growth rate, low industry concentration rate and small income difference to that of low economic growth rate, high industrial concentration and big income difference; (2) to resolve the problem of market failure is more effective than to improve public infrastructure, because improvement of the regional public infrastructure amplifies the negative effect of market failure, which shows that promoting technology diffusion and reducing the cost of congestion effect is the optimal policy for regional economy.
作者 佘时飞
出处 《上海商学院学报》 2014年第4期105-113,共9页 Business Economic Review
关键词 公共基础设施 产业区位 区域经济增长 public infrastructure, industrial location, regional economic growth
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Chinitz,B. i960, The effect of transportation forms regional economic growth, Traffic Quarterly 129 - 142. on 14.
  • 2Krugman,Paul. 1991. Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99,483 - 499.
  • 3Baldwin R P, Martin and G, Ottaviano, 2001. GlbolIncome Divergence, Trade and Industrialization.. The Geography of Growth Take-off, Journal of Economic Growth 6,5 - 37.
  • 4BiehI, 1986. The contribution of infrastructure to regional development, 2 Vol (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg).
  • 5Martin, P and G, Ottaviano, 1999. Growing Location: Industry in a Model of Endogenous Growth, European Economic Review 43,281 - 31/2.
  • 6安虎森.产业空间分布、收入差异和政府的有效调控——三论区域协调发展[J].广东社会科学,2007(4):33-41. 被引量:17
  • 7Mary Amiti, 2003. How the Sequence of Trade Liberalisation affects Industrial I.ocation. University of Melbourne,World Bank and CEPR.
  • 8Barro, R. 199{). Government spending in a simple T-nodel of endogenous growth, Journal of Political Economy 98,103- 125.
  • 9Midelfart-Knarvik, K. H, and H. G. Overman. 2002. Delocation. and European integration: is structural spending justified? Economic policy 35 : 321 - 359.
  • 10Philippe Martin and Carol Ann Rogers, 1995. Industrial Location and public infrastructure. Journal of International Economics 39,335 - 351.

二级参考文献3

  • 1Martin,p.and C.A.Rogers(1995):Industrial Location and public infrastructure,Journal of International Economics 39,pp.335-351.
  • 2Richard Baidwin,Rikard Forslid,Philippe Martin,Gianmarco Ottavino and Frederic Robert-Nicoud:“Economic Geography and Public Policy”,Princeton University Press,2003,pp68-78.
  • 3Richard Baidwin,Rikard Forslid,Philippe Martin,Gianmarco Ottavino and Frederic Robert-Nicoud:“Economic Geography and Public Policy”,Princeton University Press,2003,pp.255-256.pp.257-258.

共引文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部