期刊文献+

急性心肌梗死左主干加三支病变急诊PCI后CABG 1例

One case about acute myocardial infarction which proved to be left main with three vessel disease take emergency PCI then elective CABG
下载PDF
导出
摘要 急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克是心肌梗死最严重的后果之一,处理困难。急诊冠状动脉造影证实,急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者常表现为多支血管病变,但对于这类患者最佳的血运重建方案仍不明确,梗死相关血管再灌注及早期血流动力学稳定是治疗的关键。多数情况下,经皮冠状动脉支架置入术和冠状动脉旁路移植术两种血运重建方案的安全复合终点相似,每例患者具体实施何种方案,既要参考患者的意愿,又要考虑手术的安全性以及近期和远期疗效,以期达到最佳治疗效果。 Acute myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock is one of the most serious complications and dealt with difficult.Emergency coronary angiography usually presents multivessel disease on acute myocardial in-farction with cardiogenic shock patients,but for these patients the best revascularization solution is still unclear.Infarct-related artery reperfusion,and early hemodynamic stability is the key to treatment.PCI and CABG have the same safe and similar results,the specific implementation plan,which was taken to refer the patient’s wishes,but also to consider the safety of surgery,as well as short-term and long-term efficacy,in order to achieve optimal treatment.
出处 《中国当代医药》 2014年第30期29-31,共3页 China Modern Medicine
关键词 冠状动脉 左主干 三支病变 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 冠状动脉旁路移植术 Coronary Left main Three vessel disease Percutaneous coronary intervention Coronary artery bypass graft
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献70

  • 1王皓,黄从新,王风,刘伶,徐广马,卢志红.青年急性冠脉综合征心血管危险因素与冠状动脉病变特点研究[J].中国医学文摘(老年医学),2007,16(3):174-177. 被引量:8
  • 2杨伟,陈万春,金惠根,刘宗军,汪蔚青,施佳,王东毅,方平.急性心肌梗死不同时间窗行直接冠状动脉介入治疗的疗效比较[J].上海医学,2005,28(1):49-52. 被引量:16
  • 3赵一俏,尹学亮,傅强,李志樑.直接PCI和择期PCI治疗急性心肌梗死的疗效比较[J].广东医学,2007,28(5):775-776. 被引量:11
  • 4Hochman J, Buller C, Sleeper L, et al. Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction--etiologies, management and out-come: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronar- ies for cardiogenic shock [ J ] ? J Am Colt Cardiol, 2000,36 ( 3 suppl A ) : 1063 - 1070.
  • 5Fox KA. Anderson FA Jr, Dabbous OH, et al. Intervention in acute coronary syndromes : do patients undergo intervention on the basis of their risk character- istics? The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) [ J]. Heart, 2007,93(2) :177-182.
  • 6Babaev A, Frederick PD, Pasta DJ, et al. Trends in management and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock [J]. JAMA,2005,294(4):448-454.
  • 7Goldberg RJ, Spencer FA, Gore JM, et al. Thirty year trends (1975-2005) in the magnitude of, management of, and hospital death rates associated with car- diogenic shock in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a population-based perspective [ J ]. Circulation ,2009,119 (9) : 1211-1219.
  • 8Ramanathan K, Harkness SM, Nayar AC, et al. Cardiogenic shock in patients with preserved left ventricular systolic function: characteristics and insight into mechanisms[J]. J Am Coil Cardiol,2004,43(5) :241A.
  • 9Jacobs AK, Leopold JA, Bates E, et al. Cardiogenic shock caused by right ven- tricular infarction : a report from the SHOCK registry [ J ]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2003,41 (8) :1273-1279.
  • 10Debnmner M, Schuiki E, Minder E, et al. Proinflammatory cytokines in acute myocardial infarction with and without cardiogenic shock[J]. Clin Res Cardiol, 2008,97 ( 5 ) : 298 -305.

共引文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部