期刊文献+

乳腺导管内癌的超声诊断及误诊分析 被引量:4

Ultrasonic Diagnosis of Breast Ductal Carcinoma in Situ and the Analysis on Misdiagnosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨乳腺导管内癌的超声表现及误诊原因。方法:回顾分析经手术病理证实的17例乳腺导管内癌的超声声像图特征。结果:17例病灶中,超声诊断恶性肿瘤14例,良性病变2例,1例未发现肿块;超声诊断符合率为82.3%。根据文献和本研究中病灶的声像图特征,将17例病变分为5类:实性肿块型(6例),导管扩张型(5例),结构紊乱型(4例),囊性病灶型(1例),其他类型(1例)。结论:乳腺导管内癌的超声表现多样,充分认识乳腺导管内癌的超声声像图特征可减少误诊,结合钼靶及乳腺导管内镜检查可以减少漏诊。 Objective:To investigate the ultrasonographic findings of breast ductal carcinoma in situ and the causes of misdiag-nosis .Methods :Ultrasonographic features of 17 cases with breast ductal carcinoma in situ which were confirmed by operation and pathology were retrospectively reviewed .Results:Among the 17 cases of lesions ,according to the ultrasonic diagnosis there were 14 cases of malignant tumor ,2 cases of benign lesions ,and 1 case with no mass .Diagnostic coincidence rate was 82 . 3% by ultrasound .According to the characteristics from literatures and lesions in this study ,17 cases of lesions were roughly classified into 5 categories :solid mass(6 cases) ,conduit ectasia(5 cases) ,architecture disorder(4 cases) ,cystic mass(1 case) , other type(1 case) .Conclusions :The ultrasonographic findings of breast ductal carcinoma in situ are varied .Fully understand-ing the ultrasonographic features of breast ductal carcinoma in situ which can decrease missed-diagnosis ,combined with mam-mography examination and breast duct endoscopy which can reduce misdiagnosis ,will improve the diagnostic coincidence rate .
出处 《中国临床医学》 2014年第3期314-315,共2页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Medicine
关键词 彩色多普勒超声 乳腺导管内癌 诊断 Ultrasonography Breast ductal carcinoma in situ Diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献15

共引文献106

同被引文献35

  • 1毛明锋,杨顺实,谢元亮,孙琳,鲁慧,袁静萍.彩超与钼靶对乳腺导管内癌诊断的对比研究[J].肿瘤防治研究,2014,41(4):370-373. 被引量:10
  • 2马步云,彭玉兰,罗燕,林玲,文晓蓉,邱逦,卢强,周琛云.超声诊断乳腺癌的漏诊和误诊分析[J].华西医学,2007,22(1):16-17. 被引量:14
  • 3徐晓洲,王仲照,张柏林,王靖,魏艳辉,张保宁.乳管内视镜在伴异常乳头溢液乳管内疾病诊断中的应用[J].中华普通外科杂志,2007,22(10):754-756. 被引量:1
  • 4王怡,富丽娜,许萍,杨宝年.超声诊断乳腺导管内癌的价值探讨[J].中国医学影像技术,2007,23(10):1479-1480. 被引量:6
  • 5Shin HJ, Kim HH, Kim SM, et al. Screening-detected and symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ: differences in the sonographic and pathologic features [J]. A JR Am J Roentgenol, 2008, 190(2): 516-525.
  • 6Mun HS, Shin HJ, Kim HH, et al. Screening-detected calcified and non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: differences in the imaging and histopathological features [J]. Clin Radiol, 2013, 68(1): e27-e35.
  • 7Erbas B,.Provenzano E, Armes J, et al. The natural history of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a review [J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2006, 97(2): 135-144.
  • 8Osako T, Takahashi K, Iwase T, et al. Diagnostic ultrasonography and mammography for invasive and noninvasive breast cancer in women aged 30 to 39 years [J]. Breast Cancer, 2007, 14(2): 229-233.
  • 9Yang W, Tse GM. Sonographic, mammographic, and histopathologic correlation of symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ [J]. A JR Am J Roentgenol, 2004, 182(1): 101-110.
  • 10Cho KR, Seo BK, Kim CH, et al. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: ultrasound and mammographic findings correlated with histological findings [J]. Yonsei Med J, 2008, 49(1): 103-110.

引证文献4

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部