摘要
保尔·策兰的诗文《托特瑙山》在德意志文学和文化学界乃至西方学界都引发了巨大反响。诗与思的问题成为争论的焦点。由于西方政治正确与意识形态的影响,解释者用外在的信息和理念来强加于文本,突显诗人策兰与哲人海德格尔的对立性,硬将两者塞入受害者与施害者的阵营,因而不能从诗学文本的自主性来诠释文本。文章坚持诗学自主性的立场,试图从诗学文本本身来诠释诗文,让诗学文本自己说话,自主彰显其真理性。
Paul Celan's poem "Totdnauberg"has an enormous influence in the field of literature and culture not only in Germany but also in the whole western academic circle,which brought"poetry"and"thought"into the focus of debate.Due to the impact of the western political correctness ideology,scholars interpreted the poem in accordance with external information and ideas,highlighting the antithesis between poet Celan and philosopher Heidegger.Thus,Celan is perceived as a victim while Heidegger as a victimizer.Poetry,therefore,fails to be precisely interpreted through the autonomy of the poetic text.Adhering to the stand of poetic autonomy and aiming to interpret poetry from the angle of intrinsic poetic expression,this paper enables poetry to speak for itself as well as reflect its own truth.
出处
《同济大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第4期1-15,共15页
Journal of Tongji University:Social Science Edition