摘要
目的探讨全麻和腰硬联合麻醉用于髋关节置换术(HR)的临床效果与安全性。方法将118例髋关节置换术患者随机分为两组,对照组59例采用气管插管全麻,观察组59例采用腰硬联合麻醉,比较两组的临床麻醉效果、血液动力学变化及安全性。结果观察组的总有效98.31%明显的高于对照组86.44%(χ2=8.573,P<0.05),观察组在麻醉诱导后、插管后即刻、术中(切皮时)、拔管时的HR、SPB、DPB均低于对照组(均P<0.05),观察组的麻醉用药剂量、感觉阻滞起效、阻滞完全时间以及苏醒时间均低于对照组(均P<0.05),观察组的术后并发症发生率明显低于对照组(均P<0.05)。结论腰硬联合麻醉用于髋关节置换术效果较好,安全、可靠,患者清醒时间较短,血液动力学稳定,并发症少,不良反应少,值得临床大力推广。
objective:to discuss the general and waist hard joint anesthesia used in the clinical effect and security of the hip joint replacement(HR). Methods:118 patients with hip replacement were randomly divided into two groups,the control group in 59 patients with tracheal intubation anesthesia,observation group of 59 patients with waist hard joint anes-thesia,comparing two groups of clinical anesthesia effect,hemodynamic changes and security. Results:the total effective 98. 31% of observation group was obviously higher than the control group 86. 44%(chi - square = 8. 573,P 〈 0. 05),the observation group after anesthesia induction,immediately after intubation,intraoperative(cut skin),HR,spb extubation, DPB were lower than the control group(all P 〈 0. 05),the observation group of dosage,sensory block anesthesia effect, block completely and awakening time were lower than control group(all P 〈 0. 05),the incidence of postoperative compli-cations of observation group was obviously lower than that of control group(all P 〈 0. 05). Conclusion the waist hard joint anesthesia for hip replacement effect is good,safe,reliable,relatively short waking hours,hemodynamic stability,fewer complications,less adverse reaction,is worth promoting in the clinical practice.
出处
《泰山医学院学报》
CAS
2014年第8期763-765,共3页
Journal of Taishan Medical College
关键词
髋关节置换术
全麻
腰硬联合麻醉
hip replacement
general anesthesia
waist hard joint anesthesia