期刊文献+

全球现代海底块状硫化物矿床资源量估计 被引量:5

A GLOBAL ESTIMATE OF RESOURCE POTENTIAL FOR MODERN SEAFLOOR MASSIVE SULFIDE DEPOSITS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着世界发展对各种资源需求量的增大,海底资源究竟有多少也已成为全球各界探索的热点问题。现代海底块状硫化物(SMS)作为当今重要的潜在海底金属矿产资源,已在全球各个海域被广泛勘探和调查研究。在国际海底管理局建立的全球海底热液活动数据库基础上,利用美国地质调查所海底矿产评价"三部法",即:(1)将洋中脊、海底火山弧、弧后扩张中心圈定为全球SMS矿床远景区;(2)选定验证SMS矿床适用的矿床吨位、品位模型;(3)根据质通量、热通量、热液柱以及控制区数据估计全球热液喷口区数量与SMS矿床数量,对现代海底SMS矿床的资源量进行初步估计。结果显示:全球现代SMS矿床约为1 000个,所含资源量约为6×108 t,其中铜、锌、铅金属量为3×107 t,与陆地新生代以来的火山块状硫化物(VMS)矿床1.9×107 t相近。 Mining seMloor massive sulfide (SMS) deposits has been increasingly concerned by the geological society. However, the global resource potential remains unclear to the present. Based on the data of Glob- al Database of Seafloor Hydrothermal Systems, we make a global estimate of resource potential for the SMS according to the 3-part mineral assessment practice provided by the U. S. Geological Survey. Firstly, the distribution of SMS deposits is examined, and mid-ocean ridges, volcanic arcs, and back-arc spreading centers are selected as the permissive areas for discovery of new deposits. Secondly, the available SMS de- posit tonnage and grade model are chosen to calculate the average resource potential. Thirdly, the number of high-temperature hydrothermal vent and SMS deposits was estimated according to the data of mass flux, heat flux, hydrothermal plume and control areas. The results reveal that the number of SMS deposits is a- bout 1 000, and the total resource potential is estimated to be 6 × 108 tons, containing about 3 × 107 tons of copper, zinc and lead.
出处 《海洋地质与第四纪地质》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第5期107-118,共12页 Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology
基金 大西洋多金属硫化物成矿潜力与资源环境评价(DY125-12-R-01)
关键词 SMS矿床 远景区 矿床模型 矿床数量 资源量 SMS deposit permissive deposits deposit model deposit quantity resource potential
  • 相关文献

参考文献50

  • 1Hannington M, Jamieson J, Monecke T, et al. The abun- dance of seafloor massive sulfide deposits[J]. Geology, 2011,39(12) :1155-1158.
  • 2InterRidge Global Database of Active Submarine Hydrothermal Vent Fields [DB/OL]. http://vents-data, interridge, org/. 2013.10.
  • 3Singer D A. Basic concepts in three-part quantitative assess ments of undiscovered mineral resources[J]. Nonrenewable Resources, 1993, 2(2).. 69-81.
  • 4Pirano F. Hydrothermal processes and mineral systems[M]. Springer, 2009:581-713.
  • 5Baker E T, German C R. On the global distribution of hydro thermal vent fields[J]. Mid-Ocean Ridges, 2004 245-266.
  • 6Hannington M D, Petersen S, Herzig P M, et al. A global da- tabase of seafloor hydrothermal systems, including a digital database of geochemical analyses of seafloor polymetallic sul- fides[J]. Geological Survey of Canada, 2004 :4598.
  • 7Bird P. An updated digital model of plate boundaries[J]. Geo- chemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 2003, 4(3):4125-4135.
  • 8deRonde C E J, Massoth G J, Baker E T, et al. Submarine hydrothermal venting related to volcanic arcs[C]//S Volcanic, Geothermal and Ore Forming Fluids= Rulers and Witnesses of Processes within the Earth, 2002.
  • 9Taylor B, C and oblique s search= Solid 19718. rook K, Sinton J. E preading centers[J]. Earth (1978-2012), xtensional trans{orm zones Journal of Geophysical Re- 1994, 99(B10): 19707.
  • 10Taylor B, Martinez F. Back-arc basin basalt systematics[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2003, 210(3): 481 497.

同被引文献56

引证文献5

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部