区域间治理模式论析

A Comprehensive Analysis of Interregional Governance Mode

区域间主义作为特定国际区域之间制度化的关系和国际关系中的一种新现象,已在区域、跨区域和全球治理中发挥着重要作用,并构成兴起中的多层次全球治理体系的重要组成部分。作者将基于区域间主义实践的区域间治理视作一种全球治理新模式,就其形成、行为体、基础条件和可能路径等核心议题提出一些带有综合性的看法。首先,区域间治理作为后冷战时期迅速发展的区域主义治理的一种延伸和拓展,是国家和区域行为体对全球化和区域化的一种双重的现实回应。这使得区域间治理实际上是特定区域内部和外部的协同治理,即一种双重治理进程。其次,区域间治理进程是国家和非国家等多元行为体共同推动的,但大国和区域政府组织是推动这一进程的核心行为体,即"领导者"。再次,区域间治理的启动和持续运行需要权力、利益和认同的共同基础,其具体体现分别是权力平衡、利益共享和认同强化,它们在互动和互构中共同形成区域间治理所必需的物质和观念上的条件。最后,区域间主义所特有的制度建设、规范扩散和议程设置等功能通过在区域内部和外部所发挥的双重效应,为区域间治理提供了一系列重要的可能路径。由此,区域间治理的核心行为体、基础条件和可能路径相互影响、相互作用,共同构成区域间治理研究的一种综合分析框架。

Asian institutionalized relations among world regions and a new phenomenon in international relations,interregionalism has played an important role in regional,trans-regional and global governance,and becomes significant building blocks of an emerging multilayered global governance system.The paper argues that interregional governance should be considered as a new distinct mode of global governance based on interregionalism practice,and puts forward some comprehensive views on its core issues such as its rise,key actors,the basic conditions and alternative paths.Firstly,it argues that interregional governance is a dual realistic response to globalization and regionalization made by regional countries and other actors as a kind of extension and expansion of rapidly developing regionalism governance after the Cold War,and this results in a dual process in which the specified regional actors realize their regional internal and external collaborative governance.Secondly,it holds that the process of interregional governance is driven by regional states and non-state actors together,but regional powers and intergovernmental organizations as leadership play a crucial role in it.Thirdly,it contends that interregional governance needs the common basis of power,interests and identity,so power-balancing,interest-sharing and identity-strengthening in their interaction and mutual construction form necessary materials and an ideal condition of its emergence and continuous operation.Finally,it points out that some specific functions of interregionalism such as institution-building,norm-diffusing and agenda-setting can bring about internal and external impacts on regions,and become alternative paths of interregional governance.Finally,this paper concludes that the key actors,basic conditions and alternative paths of interregional governance in the mutual influence and interaction as a whole constitute a comprehensive analytical framework of its research.