摘要
侦查裁量权的存在具有现实基础和积极意义,但侦查裁量权的不当行使与侦查法定、侦查任意、比例原则、客观公正、侦查权力国家化等侦查原则相冲突。我国侦查裁量权存在诸多问题。对侦查裁量权进行有效规制,需要从调整侦检关系、完善侦查程序、制定规则、完善外部权利监督方面进行综合性的制度设计。在具体制度上,有必要借鉴相关国家的有益制度经验,在刑事立案制度、侦查终结移送审查起诉、侦查措施的程序性裁判、权利救济和权力配置等方面作出改进,以全面规制侦查裁量权的配置和运行。
The availability of investigative discretion has factual fundemental and positive meaning. But the improper exercises of the power will conflict with mandatory investigation legal doctrine, principle of proportionality, impersonality equity principle and the nationality of investigation power. Investigative discretion of China has many ploblems and thus to be effectively regulated. A comprehensive system of legislation, procedure, regulations and supervision. Specifically, referencing the good experience of other countries, taking reform in criminal prosecution system, transfering to prosecution examination after investigation, procedural adjudication of compulsory measure, right relief and power - disposing.
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第6期77-83,共7页
Legal Forum
关键词
侦查裁量权
侦查法治原则
法律规制
investigative discretion
investigation of the rule of law principle
legal regulation