期刊文献+

留守经历影响中职学生的考学行为、辍学行为和升学意愿吗——基于浙江、陕西两省的跟踪数据 被引量:13

Secondary Vocational Students' Participation in Entrance Examinations and Dropout Rate and Admission Rates at Higher Vocational Schools among Left-Behind Children:Based on Trace Data of Zhejiang and Shaanxi in 2011 and 2012
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文基于2011年和2012年浙江和陕西两省106所中职学校7411名高一年级学生的跟踪数据,分析了留守经历对中职学生的考学行为、辍学行为和升学意愿的影响。研究发现,在不控制其他因素的情况下,留守儿童、流动儿童与其他儿童群体中参加过中考的学生比例、辍学率和打算上高职高专的学生比例存在差别;但在控制其他因素的情况下,留守儿童与非留守儿童在考学行为、辍学行为和升学意愿上并不存在显著差剐,留守时间对中职学生的考学行为、辍学行为和升学意愿也无显著影响。因此,使用工具变量或者其他识别策略也许是这个领域研究的一个可能方向。 Based on the trace data of 7,411 freshman students at 106 secondary vocational schools in Zhejiang and Shaanxi in 2011 and 2012,this paper explores the potential correlation between experience of left-behind children and secondary vocational students' participation in entrance examinations,as well as dropout and admission rates at higher vocational schools.Analysis results indicate differences among leftbehind children,migrant children,and other children in the absence of other factors,such as the percentage of students who have taken the senior high school entrance examination,the dropout rate,and the percentage of students who intend to enter higher vocational schools.However,taking these factors into consideration,there is no significant difference among these three groups of students' participation rates in the entrance examination,dropout rate,or admissions rate at higher vocational schools.These rates are also not significantly influenced by the length of time that left-behind children are left behind.Using instrumental variables or other better recognition strategies may be the best method to promote the study in this field.
出处 《北京大学教育评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第3期63-79,190,共17页 Peking University Education Review
基金 国家自然科学基金国际重大合作项目(71110107028) 国际影响评估(International Initiatives for Impact Evaluation:3ie)项目
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1全国妇联课题组.全国农村留守儿童 城乡流动儿童状况研究报告[J].中国妇运,2013(6):30-34. 被引量:411
  • 2Sandra, P. (2002). Student mobility in rural communities: What are the implications for student achievement? Georgetown University Rebecca PhiIlips, NCREL, 10-12.
  • 3James,C. (1990). Foundation of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Har- vard University Press, 26-27.
  • 4U.S. Government accounting office. (1994). Elementary school children: Many changeschools frequently, harming their education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing office, 8-21.
  • 5Fowler Finn, T. (2001). Student stability vs. mobility. School Administrator, 58 (7) : 36- 40.
  • 6Kerbow, D. (1996). Patterns of urban student mobility and local school reform. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 1 (2) : 147-169.
  • 7Paul ,E. G. (2003). The undocumented : Educating the children of migrant workers in A- merica. Bilingual Research Journal, 27 ( 1 ) : 51.
  • 8Tucker, M. L. (1998). Moving on: Residential mobility and children's school lives. Soci- ology of Education, 71(2) : 111-129.
  • 9关颖.青年流动人口如何对下一代负责——天津市青年流动人口子女家庭教育状况调查[J].青年研究,2002(5):8-14. 被引量:46
  • 10石人炳.我国人口变动对教育发展的影响及对策[J].人口研究,2003,27(1):55-60. 被引量:56

二级参考文献64

共引文献613

同被引文献183

引证文献13

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部