期刊文献+

不同时间窗延迟经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者预后的影响 被引量:24

Prognostic effects of delayed percutaneous coronary intervention at different time windows on patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨不同时间窗延迟经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(ST-elevation myocardial infarction,STEMI)患者预后的影响.方法 将2010年1月至2013年1月因STEMI入住广东药学院第一附属医院的109例患者分为两组:A组55例(PCI治疗时间窗为12~24 h),B组54例(PCI治疗时间窗为5~14 d).A组行延迟PCI治疗后予积极药物治疗,B组经积极药物治疗患者病情稳定后行延迟PCI治疗.于入院3d内、1个月、1年分别行超声心动图检查,计算左心室收缩末容积指数(LVESVI)、左心室舒张末容积指数(LVEDVI)和左心室射血分数(LVEF),并判断左心功能的状况以及观察患者发病后1年内主要心血管事件(MACE)的发生情况.结果 两组患者术前基本临床情况以及术中情况比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).两组在入院3d内左心功能比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后1个月、1年两组患者左心功能均有改善,A组左心功能改善程度明显比B组好,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).A组在复合心血管事件、心力衰竭以及心源性病死率等方面较B组明显下降,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 错过最佳再灌注时机的急性STEMI患者在发病24 h内行延迟PCI治疗仍可使患者更多获益. Objectives To compare the prognostic effects of different time windows on delayed percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).Methods Totally 109 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong College of Pharmacy were enrolled continuously from January 2010 to January 2013.According to the timing of delayed PCI,the patients were divided into 2 groups:group A (timing at 12-24 h,drug therapy after PCI,n=55),group B (timing at 5-14 d,PCI after drug therapy,n=54).Left ventricular end-systolic volume index (LVESVI),left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were determined by echocardiogram within 72 hours,1 month and 1 year after admission.Left cardiac function was evaluated.Occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in the two groups was compared.Results The basic data and information before and during operation of the two group had no significant difference(P〉0.05).There was no significant difference in left cardiac function between the two groups at the first 3 d after admission(P〉0.05).However,1 month and 1 year after PCI,the left cardiac functions in group A were significantly better than those in group B (P〈0.05).The incidence of MACE,heart failure and mortality in group A was significantly lower than that in group B(P〈0.05).Conclusions Delayed PCI at time windows within 24 h can still improve the prognosis of patients with STEMI.
出处 《岭南心血管病杂志》 2014年第5期571-574,共4页 South China Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases
关键词 心肌梗死 时窗间 血管成形术 经腔 经皮冠状动脉 预后 myocardial infarction time window percutaneous coronary intervention prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1HORIE H, TAKAHASHI M, MINAI K, et al. Long-termbeneficial effect of late reperfusion for acute anteriormyocardial infarction with PTCA [J]. Circulation, 1998, 98(22): 2377-2382.
  • 2无.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死诊断和治疗指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2010,38(8):675-690. 被引量:1957
  • 3中国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南2012(简本)[J].中华心血管病杂志,2012,40(4):271-277. 被引量:426
  • 4RESNIC F S,WAINSTEIN M,LEE M K, et al. No-reflow isan independent predictor of death and myocardial infarctionafter percutaneous coronary intervention [J], Am Heart J,2003, 145(1): 42-46.
  • 5KEELEY E C, BOURA J A, GRINES C L. Primaryangioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acutemyocardial infarction : a quantitative review of 23 randomisedtrails[J].Lancet, 2003,361(9351): 13-20.
  • 6NDREPEPA G,KASTRATI A, MEHILU J, et al. Mechanicalreperfusion and long-term mortality in patients with acutemyocardial infarction presenting 12 to 48 hours from onset ofsymptoms [J]. JAMA, 2009, 301(5): 487-488.
  • 7MENEVEAU N, SERONDE M F,DESCOTES-GENON V,etal. Immediate versus delayed angioplasty in infarct-relatedarteries with TIMI III flow and ST segment recovery : a matchedcomparison in acute myocardial infarction? patients [J]. ClinRes Cardiol, 2009, 98(4): 257-264.
  • 8HOCHMAN J S,LAMAS G A, BULLER C E, et al. Coronaryintervention for persistent occlusion after myocardial infarction[J]. N Engl J Med, 2006, 355(23): 2395-2407.
  • 9KRUTHKUL K, SRIMAHACHOTA S,UDAYACHALERM W,et al. Importance of delayed perfusion with primary angioplastyon short-term mortality in acute myocardial infarction patients[J]. Med Assoc Thai, 2007,90(12) : 2587-2596.
  • 10DI PASQUALE P,CANNIZZARO S,PARHINELLO G, et al.Is delayed facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention betterthan immediate in reperfused myocardial infarction? Sixmonths follow up findings [ J ]. J Thromb Thrombolysis, 2006,21(2): 147-157.

二级参考文献23

  • 1Collaborative Research Group of Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction.重组葡激酶与重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗急性心肌梗死的随机多中心临床试验[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(8):691-696. 被引量:43
  • 2Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery ( EACTS ), European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), Wijns W, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J,2010 , 31:2501-2555.
  • 3Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/ SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines and the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions. Circulation, 2011, 124 :e574-651.
  • 4Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2011,58 :e123-210.
  • 5Nashef SA, Roques F, Michel P, et al. European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation ( EuroSCORE ). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 1999,16:9-13.
  • 6Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med, 2009,360:961- 972.
  • 7Peterson ED, Dai D, DeLong ER, et al. Contemporary mortality risk prediction for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 588,398 procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. J Am Coil Cardiol,2010,55:1923-1932.
  • 8Online STS fish calculator [ S/OL]. [ 2012-01-01 ]. http:// riskcalc, sts. org/STSWebRiskCalc273/de, aspx.
  • 9Mehta SR, Tanguay JF, Eikelboom JW, et al. Double-dose versus standard-dose clopidogrel and high-dose versus low-dose aspirin in individuals undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes ( CURRENT-OASIS 7 ): a randomised factorial trial. Lancet,2010,376 : 1233-1243.
  • 10Mehta SR, Granger CB, Eikelboom JW, et al. Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the OASIS-5 trial. J Am Cell Cardiol,2007,50 : 1742-1751.

共引文献2358

同被引文献444

引证文献24

二级引证文献153

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部