期刊文献+

阴道植入物对成纤维细胞增殖和蛋白合成的影响

Effect of transvaginal mesh on proliferation and collagen synthesis of fibroblasts
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨不同网片对盆底功能障碍性疾病患者阴道前壁成纤维细胞增殖、胶原蛋白合成的影响。方法:选取2013年3~5月在该院妇产科,行盆底重建术的患者5例为研究对象。术中切取阴道前壁组织,组织块培养法于体外行成纤维细胞原代培养。用抗波形蛋白抗体和抗角蛋白抗体进行免疫组化法鉴定成纤维细胞。将培养至第4~6代成纤维细胞分为4组,设加入Prolift网片为Prolift组、加入Avaulta网片为Avaulta组、加入TVT-O网片为TVT-O组及不加网片为正常对照组。采用四甲基偶氮唑蓝比色法(MTT法)检测4组培养2、4、7天时的细胞增殖情况,采用Western bolt法检测细胞与网片共培养4天时成纤维细胞分泌Ⅰ、Ⅲ型胶原蛋白情况。结果:1网片与细胞共培养2天时,正常对照组、Prolift组、Avaulta组和TVT-O组吸光值分别为(0.790±0.023)、(0.655±0.017)、(0.644±0.022)和(0.538±0.067);培养4天时,分别为(0.843±0.014)、(0.716±0.045)、(0.673±0.025)和(0.283±0.008);培养7天时,分别为(2.040±0.035)、(1.201±0.126)、(1.109±0.087)和(0.196±0.017)。正常对照组各时期细胞吸光度值分别与其他3组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。Prolift组与Avaulta组各时期之间的吸光度值分别比较,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。培养2天时,Prolift组和Avaulta组分别与TVT-O组比较,差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05);培养4天和7天时各组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05);2网片与细胞共培养4天时,4组Ⅰ型胶原蛋白表达量分别为(7.801±0.253)、(5.421±0.191)、(5.274±0.195)和(4.041±0.154);Ⅲ型胶原分别为(1.062±0.104)、(0.870±0.051)、(0.865±0.047)和(0.651±0.073)。正常对照组的Ⅰ、Ⅲ型胶原蛋白分别与其他3组进行比较,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05),其中Prolift组和Avaulta组分别比较,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),但Prolift组、Avaulta组分别与TVT-O组进行比较,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论:网片孔径越大,对成纤维细胞增殖、胶原蛋白合成影响越小。 Objective: To explore the effects of different meshes on proliferation and collagen synthesis of fibroblasts in anterior va- ginal wall of patients with pelvic floor dysfunction. Methods: Five patients with pelvic floor dysfunction undergoing pelvic floor reconstruc- tion surgery in department of gynecology and obstetrics of the hospital from March to May in 2013 were selected as study objects. Anterior va- ginal wall tissue samples were obtained during operation, then tissue block culture method was used to conduct primary culture of fibroblasts in vitro, fibroblasts were identified by immunohistochemical staining with anti - vimentin antibody and anti - keratin antibody. The fibroblasts from the fourth generation to the sixth generation were divided into four groups : Prolift group ( treated with Prolift mesh), Avaulta group ( treated with Avanlta mesh), TVT - O group ( treated with TVT - O mesh) and normal control group ( without mesh) . MTI' method was used to detect cell proliferation on the second, the fourth and the seventh day in the four groups; Western bolt was used to detect type I , Iil collagens secreted by fibroblasts on the fourth day of coculture of fibroblasts and mesh. Results: On the second day of coculture of fibroblasts and mesh, light absozption values in normal control group, Prolift group, Avaulta group and TVT - O group were ( 0. 790 ± 0. 023 ), (0. 655 ±0. 017), (0. 644 ±0. 022) and (0. 538 ±0. 067), respectively; on the fourth day of eoculture of fibroblasts and mesh, light ab- sorption values in normal control group, Prolift group, Avaulta group and TVT- O group were (0. 843 ± 0. 014), (0. 716 ± 0. 045 ), (0. 673 ± 0. 025 ) and ( 0. 283 ± 0. 008 ), respectively ; on the seventh day of cocuhure of fibroblasts and mesh, light absorption values in normal control group, Prolift group, Avauha group and TVT - 0 group were ( 2. 040 ± 0. 035 ), ( 1. 201 ± 0. 126 ), ( 1. 109 ± 0. 087 ) and (0. 196 ± 0. 017 ) , respectively. There was statistically significant difference between normal control group and the other three groups (P 〈 0. 05 ) . There was no statistically significant difference between Prolifl group and Avauha group ( P 〉 0. 05 ) . On the second day of eocul- ture of fibroblasts and mesh, there was no statistically significant difference between Prolift group, Avanha group and TVT - O group, respec- tively ( P 〉 0. 05 ) ; on the fourth day and the seventh day, there was statistically significant difference ( P 〈 0. 05 ) . On the fourth day of cocuhure of fibroblasts and mesh, the expression levels of type I collagen in the four groups were (7. 801 ± 0. 253 ) , (5. 421± 0. 191 ), (5. 274 ±0. 195) and (4. 041 ±0. 154), respectively; the expression levels of type m collagen in the four groups were ( 1. 062±0. 104), (0. 870 ± 0. 051 ) , (0. 865 ± 0. 047 ) and ( 0. 651 - 0. 073 ) , respectively. There were statistically significant differences in the expression levels of type I and 11[ collagens between normal control group mad the other three groups ( P 〈 0. 05 ) . There was no statistically significant difference between Prolift group and Avaulta group ( P 〉 0. 05 ), but there was statistically significant difference between Prolift group,Avaulta group and TVT - O group, respectively ( P 〈 0.05) . Conclusion: The greater the mesh aperture is, the smaller the impact on proliferation and collagen synthesis of fibroblasts is.
出处 《中国妇幼保健》 CAS 北大核心 2014年第31期5036-5039,共4页 Maternal and Child Health Care of China
基金 福建省科技创新平台项目〔2010Y2005〕 中华预防医学会科研资金支持项目〔20131303〕
关键词 盆底器官脱垂 成纤维细胞 聚丙烯 增殖 胶原蛋白 Pelvic organ prolapse Fibroblast Polypropyl-ene Proliferation Collagen
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, et al. Prevalence of symp- tomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women [J] . JAMA, 2008, 300 (11): 1311-1316.
  • 2Walker GJ, Gunasekera P. Pelvic organ prolapse and ineonti nence in developing countries : review of prevalence and riskfactors [J] . Int Urogynecol J, 2011, 22 (2) : 127 - 135.
  • 3胡浩,许克新,那彦群,王晓峰.女性尿失禁流行病学调查现状及其发病机制的研究进展[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2010,31(11):786-789. 被引量:15
  • 4王建六,曹冬,张晓红,王世军,李小平,吴俊改,陈捷.北京郊区女性尿失禁及盆腔脏器脱垂发病情况及其对生活质量影响的抽样调查[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2007,8(1):5-9. 被引量:85
  • 5Murphy M, Holzberg A, van Raalte H, et al. Time to rethink: an evidence -based response from pelvic surgeons to the FDA Safety Communication :" UPDATE on Serious Complications As- sociated with Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh for Pel- vic Organ Prolapse" [J] . Int Urogynecol J, 2012, 23 (1) : 5-9.
  • 6Geller E J, Parnell BA, Dunivan GC. Pelvic floor function be- fore and after robotic sacrocolpopexy: one - year outeomes [J] J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2011, 18 (3) : 322 -327.
  • 7Jonsson Funk M, Siddiqui NY, Pate V, et al. Sling revision/ removal for mesh erosion and urinary retention : long - term risk and predictors [J] . Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 208 ( 1 ) : 73. el -73. e7.
  • 8Gomelsky A, Dmochowski RR. Biocompatibility assessment of synthetic sling materials for female stress urinary incontinence [J] .JUrol, 2007, 178 (gPtl): 1171 -1181.
  • 9Sanjun A, Herntndez S, Pahisa J,et al. Port - site metastasis after laparoscopic surgery for endometrial carcinoma: two case reports [J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2005, 96(2):539-542.
  • 10Duchrow M, Windhvel U, Bethge T, et al. Polypropylene synthetic mesh modifies growth of human ceils in vitro An ex- perimental study [ J ]. C hirurg,2002, 73 (2) : 154 - 160.

二级参考文献25

  • 1[1]Abrams P,Blaivas J G,Stanton SL,et al.The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function.The International Continence Society Committee on Standardisation of terminology.Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl,1988,114:5219.
  • 2[4]Abrams P,Blaivas JG,Stanton SL,et al.The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function recommended by the International Continence Society.Int Urogynecol J,1990,1:4532465.
  • 3[6]Ouslander JG.Urinary incontinence in nursing homes.J Am Geriatr Soc,1990,38:289-291.
  • 4[8]Brocklehurst JC.Urinary incontinence in the community-analysis of a MORI poll.BMJ,1993,306:832-834.
  • 5[9]Wyman JF.Influence of functional,urological,and environmental characteristics on urinary incontinence in community-dwelling older women.Nurs Res,1993,42:270-275.
  • 6[10]Wyman JF.The psychiatric and emotional impact of female pelvic floor dysfunction.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol,1994,6:336-337.
  • 7[11]Norton C.The effects of urinary incontinence in women.Int Rehabil Med,1982,4:9-14.
  • 8[12]Lam GW,Foldspang A,Elving LB,et al.Social context,social abstention,and problem recognition correlated to adult female urinary incontinence.Dan Med Bull,1992,39:565-570.
  • 9[13]Sandvik H,Kveine E,Hunskaar S.Female urinary incontinence-psychosocial impact,self-care,and consultations.Scand J Caring Sci,1993,7:53-56.
  • 10[14]Sutherst JR.Sexual dysfunction and urinary incontinence.Br J Obstet Gynaecol,1979,86:387-388.

共引文献101

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部