2010年至2013年护理类系统评价文献量的统计分析

Nursing systematic literature review analysis from 2010 to 2013

目的 探讨近4年护理类系统评价文献发表期刊、第一作者机构、研究方向及质量情况. 方法 通过检索中国医院知识总库（CHKD）、维普生物医学全文数据库、清华同方知网-中国学术期刊全文数据库、万方数据库、Pubmed数据库、Medline数据库,各个数据库均采用相同检索词和检索式（各数据库检索式的表达方式根据各数据库的要求而定）,检索时间限定为2010年1月至2013年12月.结果 共获得护理相关文献75篇,分别发表在35种期刊上,其中,19种期刊各刊登1篇,在质量评价中,偏倚检验采用发表偏倚检验36篇,描绘森林图表49篇,选题有争议性2篇,结果解释有确切P值24篇,16篇采用流程图,所有文献异质性检验均无图形法.第一作者机构以学校和医院进行分类统计,2010年至2013年发文量分别为38篇和37篇.结论 有关护理类系统评价文献发表期刊多而散,内容重复性少,结构不严谨,质量有待提高,应注意Meta分析类研究的规范性要求,提高发文量.

Objective To explore literature published periodicals,the organizations of the first authors,the research direction and the quality about nursing system literature in recent four years.Methods By retrievaling the databases of China Hospital Knowledge （CHKD）,VIP Biomedical,China National Knowledge Infrastructure （CNKI）,Wanfang,Pubmed and Medline,each database used the same search term and retrieval type （the retrieval type differed by each database grammar）,and the retrieval time was limited from Jan,2010 to Dec,2013.Results 75 nursing literature published on 35 journals were obtained,of which 19 journals published only one paper.In terms of quality evaluation,publication bias tested 36,49 forest charts,2 disputing topics,24 with exact P value cycle interpretations,16 used flowcharts,and none of the literature heterogeneity tests used graphical method.By classifying the organizations of the first authors as schools and hospitals,the number of published papers were 38 and 37 separately from 2010 to 2013.Conclusions The nursing systematic literature were always with vast amount and dispersed content,less repetitive content was seen during the literature,The structure was not rigorous,and quality remains to be improved.It should be noted that Meta-analysis study normative has its requirements and more published papers are needed.