期刊文献+

临床药师参与1例粪肠球菌腹腔感染患者的治疗分析

Analysis of Clinical Pharmacists Participating in the Treatment for a Patient with Abdominal Infection Caused by Enterococcus faecalis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨临床药师在参与粪肠球菌腹腔感染患者抗感染治疗中的作用。方法:通过1例粪肠球菌腹腔感染的案例,根据药敏试验给予替考拉宁治疗后,患者感染指标呈下降趋势,但患者反复、间断性发热。临床药师从利奈唑胺与替考拉宁的体内外抗菌活性、临床疗效与组织穿透性方面进行了对比,建议医师将替考拉宁替换为利奈唑胺。患者治疗2 d后,感染得到控制。结果:抗感染取得了良好的效果,患者好转出院。结论:临床药师参与患者抗感染方案制订,可为医师和患者提供更加有效的治疗方案。 OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of clinical pharmacists in the treatment for patients with Enterococcus faecalis-induced abdominal infection. METHODS: The patient with E. faecalis-induced abdominal infection received teicoplanin based on drug sensitive test; infection indicators declined, but the patient suffered from recurrent and intermittent fever. Clinical pharmacists compared linezolid with teicoplanin in terms of in vitro antibacterial activity, clinical efficacy and tissue penetration, and suggested physicians to use linezolid instead of teicoplanin; two days later, the infection was controlled. RESULTS: Good therapeutic effect had been obtained, and the patient was discharged from the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical pharmacist who participate in developing anti-infection programs could provide more effective treatment options for physicians and patients.
出处 《中国药房》 CAS CSCD 2014年第42期4023-4025,共3页 China Pharmacy
关键词 利奈唑胺 替考拉宁 粪肠球菌 腹腔感染 Linezolid Teicoplanin Enterococcus faecalis Abdominal infection
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Solomkin JS, Mazuski JE, Bradley JS, et al. Diagnosis and management of complicated intra-abdominal infec- tion in adults and children: guidelines by the Surgical In- fection Society and the Infectious diseases Society of America[J]. Clin lnfect Dis, 2 01 O, 5 0 (2) : 13 3.
  • 2辛小娟,黄文祥,李佳俊,孙秋.肠球菌对利奈唑胺的耐药性研究[J].中国抗生素杂志,2013,38(8):624-628. 被引量:8
  • 3Balaei GE, Shirmohammadi A, Aghazadeh M, et al. Anti- biotic resistance in enterococcus faecalis isolated from hospitalized patients [J]. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Pros- pects, 2013,7(2) : 102.
  • 4Tascini C, Gemignani G, Doria R, et al. Linezolid treat- ment for gram-positive infections : a retrospective compar- ison with teicoplanin[J]. J Chemother, 2009,21 (3) : 311.
  • 5Jiang H, Tang RN, Wang J. Linezolid versus vancomycin or teicoplanin for nosocomial pneumonia: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials [J]. Eur J Clin Microbiol InfectDis,2013,32(9) : 1 121.
  • 6Fajardo OM, Hidalgo OR, Rodriguez GS, et al. Activity of vancomycin, teicoplanin and linezolid in methicillin resis- tant coagulase-negative Staphylococci isolates from paedi- atric blood cultures[J]. Rev Esp Quimioter, 2012,25 ( 1 ) : 25.
  • 7Dryden MS. Linezolid pharmacokinetics and pharmacody- namics in clinical treatment[J]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2011,66 (Suppl 4) : 7.
  • 8Traunmiiller F, Schintler MV, Spendel S, et al.Linezolid concentrations in infected soft tissue and bone following repetitive doses in diabetic patients with bacterial foot in- fections[J], lnt JAntimicrob Agents, 2010,36( 1 ) : 84.
  • 9Schtilin T, Thauvin-Eliopoulos C, Moellering RC, et al. Activities of the oxazolidinones linezolid and eperezolid in experimental intra-abdominal abscess due to Enterococ- cus faecalis or vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium [J].4ntimicrob Agents Chemother, 1999,43 (12) : 2 873.
  • 10Depestel DD, Peloquin CA, Carver PL. Peritoneal dialysis fluid concentrations of linezolid in the treatment of vanco- mycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium peritonitis[J]. Phar- macotherapy, 2003, 23(10) : 1 322.

二级参考文献17

  • 1胡龙华,贾坤茹,陈东红,胡晓彦,徐建民,桂炳东.临床分离的肠球菌株耐药性变迁分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2004,14(8):944-946. 被引量:30
  • 2Vergidis P I, Falagas M E. New antibiotic agents for blood stream infections[J]. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2008, 32(Suppll): 60-65.
  • 3Auckland C, Teare L, Cooke F, et al. Linezolid-resistant enterococci report of the first isolates in the United Kingdom[J]. JAntimocrob Chemother, 2002, 50(5): 743-746.
  • 4Potoski B A, Adams J, Clarke L, et al. Epidemiologicalpmfde of linezolid-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2006, 43 (3): 165-171.
  • 5Ruggero K A, Schroeder L K, Schreckenberger P C, et al. Nosocomial superinfections due to linezolid-resistant Enterococcus faecalis: evidence for a gene dosage effect on linezolid MICs[J]. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2003, 47(3): 511-513.
  • 6Koh W J, Kwon O J, Gwak H, et al. Daily 300 mg dose of linezolid for the treatment of intractable multidrug, resistant and extensively drag-resistant tuberculosis[J]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2009, 64: 388-391.
  • 7Sood S, Malhotra M, Das B K, et al. Enterococcal infections & antimicrobial resistance [J]. Indian J Med Res, 2008, 128(2): 111-121.
  • 8Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility testing[S]. Nineteenth Informational Supplement. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2009, 29(3): M 100-S 19.
  • 9Marshall S H, Donskey C J, HuRon-Thomas R, et al. Gene dosage and linezolid resistance in Enteroeoeeusfaecium and Enteroccus faeealis[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2002, 46(10): 3334-3336.
  • 10Auckland C, Teare I, Cooke F, et al. Iinezolid-resistant enterococci report of the first isolates in the United Kingd [J]. JAntimocrob Chemother, 2002, 50(5): 743-746.

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部