期刊文献+

民主与腐败:以印度为个案的研究 被引量:1

Democracy and Corruption: A Case Study of India
原文传递
导出
摘要 民主在某种程度上可以遏制腐败,是不言自明的道理。但在实行民主制特别是实行西方式代议制民主的国家中,却有许多国家深陷腐败而无力自拔。印度这个自称为世界上最大的民主国家,自独立以来,逐步由一般性腐败发展到政治腐败,再到制度性腐败,说明民主制度本身并不能自动遏制腐败,在一定条件下它还可能成为腐败的催化剂。民主制度要能够遏制腐败,要求所建立的是真正的而不是形式上的民主,而与制度建设同样重要的,是所选择的制度形式是否具有使其有效发挥作用的本土条件。 To a certain extent, democracy can curb corruption, which is a self-evident truth. However, in some countries where democracy, Western-style representative democracy in particular, is in place, corruption is still prevalent. Indi- a, claiming itself to be the world's largest democracy, has since its independence experienced the deterioration from general corruption to political corruption, until institutional corruption, indicating that the democratic system itself cannot automati- cally curb corruption, and under certain circumstances, it may become catalyst for corruption. For the democratic system to curb corruption, it is necessary to establish real rather than formal democracy; equally as institutional building, it is neces- sary to choose a form of democracy that is supported with indigenous conditions.
出处 《江苏行政学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第6期74-79,共6页 The Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute
关键词 民主 腐败 制度建设 制度缺陷 本土条件 democracy corruption institution building system defects indigenous conditions
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Soma Pillay and Nirmala Dorasamy, Linking cultural dimensions with the nature of corruption:An institu- tional theory perspective, International Journal of Cross Cultural Management ,2010 : 10.
  • 2Estelle Fach and Anga TimiMna edited, Staying on Track : Tackling Corruption in Climate Change, UNDP, 2011.
  • 3O. P. Dwived and R. B. Jain, Bureaucratic Morality in India,International Political Science Review,1988.3.
  • 4S.T. Quah, Curbing Corruption in India: An Impossi- ble Dream? Asian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 16, No. 3, December 2008.
  • 5Michael Hager, Bureaucratic Corruption in India, Com- parative Political Studies 1973.6.
  • 6Stefan Krause and Fabio Mendez, Corruption and Elec- tions ,Economics & Politics ,July,2009.
  • 7Mark J. Rozell Edited. Media Power, Media Politics, Rowman & Litthfield Publishers, Inc. 2003.
  • 8Alan Heston and Vijia Kumar, Institutional Flaws and Corruption Incentives in India,Journal of Development Studies, October 2008.
  • 9马克思恩格斯全集:第10卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1962:658.
  • 10米歇尔·克罗齐耶.法令不能改变社会[M].张月,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2008:2.

共引文献10

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部