期刊文献+

高管变更机制效率与机构投资者治理角色——基于内生性视角的实证新发现 被引量:7

The Efficiency of Top Management Turnover Mechanism and the Governance Role of Institutional Investors——A New Empirical Finding from the perspective of Endogeneity
原文传递
导出
摘要 以2008、2009年两市A股发生了高管变更事件上市公司的数据为研究样本,基于内生性视角实证检验了机构投资者持股与上市公司高管变更机制效率之间的相互作用。在普通最小二乘法(OLS)证实了两者之间存在内生性关系的基础上,进一步的二阶段最小二乘法(TSLS)研究表明:(1)机构投资者持股行为显著影响了高管变更机制效率,但高管变更机制效率对于机构择股决策并没有显著影响;(2)机构投资者对于高管变更机制效率的改善只体现在提升公司的市场绩效方面,对于改善公司的财务绩效没有显著的积极作用;(3)只有压力抑制型的机构投资者能够显著影响高管变更机制效率。 From the perspective of the problem of endogeneity, this paper empirically tested the interaction between the efficiency of top management turnover mechanism and institutional investors' governance behavior, with the datum of Chinese A-share listed companies of 2008 and 2009 whose top management have changed. The OLS confirmed that the interrelationship between the institutional investors' behavior and the top management turnover mechanism is statistically significant. The further TSLS established the conclusions of this paper: Firstly, the institutional investors' behavior significantly influences the efficiency of top management turnover mechanism, but the inverse relationship is not approved. Secondly, the governance behavior of institutional investors only improves the market performance of listed companies. The positive effect of institutional investors on the amelioration of financial performance is not proved significant. Thirdly, only the pressure-resistant institutional investors are confirmed to have influence on the efficiency of top management turnover mechanism.
出处 《山西财经大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第11期74-86,共13页 Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"中国信用制度体系建设及其次序研究"(09AZD046)的阶段性成果
关键词 机构投资者 高管变更机制效率 内生性关系 institutional investors efficiency of top management turnover mechanism endogeneity relationship
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1潘越,戴亦一,魏诗琪.机构投资者与上市公司“合谋”了吗:基于高管非自愿变更与继任选择事件的分析[J].南开管理评论,2011,14(2):69-81. 被引量:100
  • 2Stuart C. Gilson. Management Turnover and Financial Distress [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1989(25): 241-262.
  • 3Michael S. Weisbach. Outside Directors and CEO Turnover [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1988(20): 431-460.
  • 4Steven N. Kaplan. Top Executive Rewards and Firm Performance: A Comparison of Japan and the U.S [J]. Journal of Politi-cM Economy, 1994(3):510-546.
  • 5Steven N. Kaplan. Top Executives, Turnover, and Firm Performance in Germany [J]. Journal of Law, Economics and Organi- zation, 1994( 1 ): 142-159.
  • 6Farrell K J, Whidbee D A. Impact of firm performance expectations on CEO turnover and replacement decisions [J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2003(36): 165-196.
  • 7Firth M, Fung P, Oliver M R. Corporate performance and CEO compensation in China [J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2006( 12): 693-714.
  • 8Denis D J, Denis D K. Performance Changes Following Top Management Dismissals [J]. The Journal of Finance, 1995(4): 1029-1057.
  • 9Eugene P H Furtado, Michael S Rozeff. The wealth effects of company initiated management changes [J]. Journal of finan- cial economics, 1987(18): 147-160.
  • 10Mark R Huson, Paul H Malatesta, Robert Parrino. Managerial succession and firm performance [J]. Journal of Financial E- conomics, 2004(2): 237-275.

二级参考文献206

共引文献650

同被引文献121

引证文献7

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部