2Abeler, J., & Marklein, F. (2008). Fungibility, labels, and consumption. IZA Discussion Paper No. 3500.
3Arkes, H. R., Hirshleifer, D., Jiang, D. L., & Lim, S. S. (2008). Reference point adaptation: Test in the domain of security trading. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105, 67-81.
4Bonini, N., & Rumiati, R. (2002). Acceptance of a price discount: The role of the semantic relatedness between purchases and the comparative price format. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 203-220.
5Brendl, C. M., Markman, A. B., & Higgins, E. T. (1998). Mental accounting as self-regulation: Representativeness to goal-derived categories. Zeitschrif t fur Sozialpsychologie, 29, 89-104.
6Chatterjee, S., Heath, T. B., & Min, J. (2009). The susceptibility of mental accounting principles to evaluation mode effects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 22, 120-137.
7Cheema, A., & Soman, D. (2006). Malleable mental accounting: The effect of flexibility on the justification of attractive spending and consumption decision. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16, 33-44.
8Cowley, E. (2008). The perils of hedonic editing. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 71-84.
9Duxbury, D., Keasey, K., Zhang, H., & Chow, S. L. (2005). Mental accounting and decision making: Evidence under reverse conditions where money is spent for time saved. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26, 567-580.
10Heath, T. B., Chatterjee, S., & France, K. R. (1995). Mental accounting and changes in price: The frame dependence of reference dependence. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 90-97.
