期刊文献+

地特胰岛素对2型糖尿病患者体质量影响的临床观察 被引量:2

Clinical Observation of the Effect of Levemir on theBody Mass of Type 2 Diabetes Patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察口服磺脲类失效的2型糖尿病患者起始地特胰岛素后对患者体质量的影响。方法选择2011年1月至2012年12月在西安交通大学附属三二○一医院内分泌科门诊就诊的既往口服磺脲类治疗效果不佳而未曾接受胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者66例,以体质量指数(BMI)作为患者体质量的评估标准将患者分为3组:BMI<24 kg/m2者为A组(20例);24 kg/m2≤BMI<28kg/m2者为B组(22例);BMI≥28 kg/m2者为C组(24例)。三组均给予地特胰岛素治疗,起始剂量为0.2 U/(Kg·d)。分别测定并比较各组患者治疗前后空腹血糖(FPG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、BMI及胰岛素用量。结果治疗后A、B、C组FPG值均较治疗前显著降低[(5.08±0.38)mmol/L vs(14.07±1.22)mmol/L、(5.03±0.39)mmol/L vs(14.01±1.20)mmol/L、(4.9±0.47)mmol/L vs(13.52±1.49)mmol/L,均P<0.05)],三组间治疗前无显著差异(P>0.05),治疗后C组与A组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),C组降低最显著;治疗后HbA1c值A、B、C组均较治疗前显著降低[(5.52±0.40)%vs(8.46±0.48)%、(5.48±0.38)%vs(8.28±0.60)%、(5.54±0.37)%vs(8.36±0.58)%,均P<0.05];治疗前后BMI仅C组差异有统计学意义,治疗前和治疗后三组间比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),分别为C组>B组>A组。三组间地特胰岛素用量比较差异有统计学意义,A、B组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),C组药物剂量[(18.88±2.66)U]显著高于A、B两组[(13.45±1.47)U、(14.73±1.42)U,均P<0.05]。结论口服磺脲类失效的患者起始地特胰岛素治疗,可有效降低不同BMI的2型糖尿病患者血糖,同时患者体质量无显著增加,肥胖患者体质量有一定程度的降低。 Objective To observe the effect of levemir on body mass of type 2 diabetes patients who had OAD failure (sulfonylureas) and not been treated with insulin before.Methods A total of 66 cases of type 2 diabetes patients,who had OAD failure(sulfonylureas) and without insulin therapy before,admitted in No.3201 Hospital Affiliated to Xi'an Jiaotong University from Jan.2011 to Dec.2012 were divided into three groups according to their body mass index(BMI):BMI 〈24 kg/m^2 as group A (20 cases) ;24 kg/m^2 ≤BMI 〈28 kg/m^2 as group B (22 cases) ;BMI≥28 kg/m^2 as group C (24 cases).Patients in all of the three groups were given insulin levemir therapy,with the starting dose of 0.2 U/(kg · d).The levels of fasting plasma glucose (FPG),glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c),BMI before and after treatment and insulin dosage of the three groups were analyzed.Results After treatment,FPG values of group A,B,C were all significantly lower than those before treatment [(5.08 ± 0.38) mmol/L vs (14.07 ± 1.22) rmtmol/L,(5.03 ± 0.39) mmol/L vs (14.01 ±1.20) rmtmol/L,(4.9 ±0.47) mmol/L vs (13.52±1.49) mmol/L,P〈0.05)],there were no statistically significant differences among the values of the three groups before treatment (P 〉 0.05),while there was statistically significant difference between the values of group C and group A after treatment(P 〈 0.05),and the value of group C reduced the most significantly.After treatment,HbA1c values of group A,B,C were significantly lower than those before treatment [(5.52 ± 0.40) % vs (8.46 ± 0.48)%,(5.48 ±0.38)% vs (8.28 ±0.60)%,(5.54 ±0.37)% vs (8.36 ±0.58)%,P 〈 0.05].There was statistically significant difference of BMI before and after treatment only in group C ; and there were statistically significant differences of BMI between either two groups of the three before and after treatment(P 〈0.05),and BMI of group C 〉 group B 〉 group A.There were also statistically significant differences of insulin dosage among the three groups,while the difference between group A and group B was not statistically significant (P 〉 0.05),insulin dosage of group C [(18.88 ± 2.66) U] was significantly higher than group A and group B [(13.45 ± 1.47) U,(14.73 ± 1.42) U,both P 〈 0.05].Conclusion Initiating levemir therapy for patientswith OAD failure(sulfonylurea) can effectively reduce the levels of blood sugar in type 2 diabetes patients with different BMI,with no significant increase to their body mass,while the body mass of obese patients has some degree of decrease.
作者 赵晓宏 陈灿
出处 《医学综述》 2014年第20期3806-3807,3810,共3页 Medical Recapitulate
关键词 地特胰岛素 2型糖尿病 体质量 Levemir Type 2 diabetes Body mass
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1母义明.地特胰岛素在糖尿病治疗中的应用与体重控制[J].中国糖尿病杂志,2012,20(5):397-399. 被引量:8
  • 2No authors listed.Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)[J] .Lancet,1998,352 (9193):837-853.
  • 3The diabetes control and complications Research Group.Adverse events and their association with treatment regimens inthe diabetes control and complications trial[J] .Diabetes Care,1995,18 (11):1415-1427.
  • 4Nichols GA,Gomez-Caminero A.Weight changes following the intiation of new anti-hyperglycaemic therapy[J] .Diabetes Obes Metab,2007,9(1):96-102.
  • 5Philis-Tsimikas A,Charpentier G,Clauson P,et al.Comparison of once-daily insulin detemir with nph insulin added to a regimen of oral antidiabetic drugs in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes[J] .Clin Ther,2006,28(10):1569-1581.
  • 6Dornhorst A,Lüddeke H J,Koenen C,et al.Transferring to insulin detemir from NPH insulin or insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes patients on basal-only therapy with oral antidiabetic drugs improves glycaemic control and reduces weight gain and risk of hypoglycaemia:14-week follow-up data from PREDICTIVETM[J] .Diabetes Obes Metab,2008,10(1):75-81.
  • 7Rosenstock J,Davies M,Home PD,et al.A randomised,52-week,treat-to-target trial comparing insulin detemir with insulin glargine when administered as add-on to glucose-lowering drugs in insulinnaive people with type 2 diabetes[J] .Diabetologia,2008,51 (3):408-416.
  • 8沈洁.地特胰岛素减少体重增加的可能机制与临床应用[J].中国糖尿病杂志,2010,18(3):238-240. 被引量:40
  • 9Pumell JQ,weyef C.wejght effect of current and experimental drugs for diabetes mellitus; from promotion to alleviation ofobasity[J] .Treat Endocnol,2003,2(1):33-47.
  • 10Hennige AM,Sartorius T,Tschritter O,et al.Tissue selectivity of insulin detemir action in vivo[J] .Diabetologia,2006,49 (6):1274-1282.

二级参考文献51

  • 1The Diabetes Control and Complications Research Group. Adverse events and their association with treatment regimens in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes Care, 1995,18 : 1415-1427.
  • 2UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet, 1998,352: 837 -853.
  • 3Yki-Jarvinen H, Ryysy L, Kauppila M, et al. Effect of obesity on the response to insulin therapy in noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 1997,82 : 4037-4043.
  • 4DCCT Research Group. Weight gain associated with intensive therapy in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes Care, 1988,11 : 567-573.
  • 5Lin X, Taguchi A,Park S, et al. Dysregulation of insulin receptor substrate 2 in beta cells and brain causes obesity and dia betes. J Clin Invest,2004,114:908-916.
  • 6Brunner GA, Sendhofer G, Wutte A, et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of long-acting insulin analogue NN304 in comparison to NPH insulin in humans. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes, 2000,108 : 100-105.
  • 7Havelund S, Ribel U, Plum A, et al. The mechanism of protraction of insulin detemir, a long acting, acylated analogue of human insulin. Diabetes, 2004,53 : P462.
  • 8Hermansen K, Fontaine P, Kukolja KK, et al. Insulin analogues (insulin detemir and insulin aspart) versus traditional human insu lins (NPH insulin and regular human insulin) in basal-bolus therapy for patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia, 2004,47 : 622-629.
  • 9Raslovd K, Bogoev M, Raz I,et al. Insulin detemir and insulin aspart: a promising basal-bolus regimen for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2004,66:193-201.
  • 10Haak T, Tiengo A, Draeger E,et al. Lower within-subject variability of fasting blood glucose and reduced weight gain with insulin detemir compared to NPH insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2005,7 : 56-64.

共引文献45

同被引文献19

引证文献2

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部