期刊文献+

胸腰椎骨折经Wiltse肌间隙入路与传统入路的临床对比研究 被引量:4

Thoracolumbar Fractures by Wiltse Muscular Clearance Clinical Comparative Study Approach and Traditional Approach
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经Wiltse肌间隙入路内固定与传统入路治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床疗效对比。方法本研究纳入2011年5月至2012年10月收治的行单节段椎弓根螺钉内固定结合椎体内植骨术的患者46例。术前脊髓损伤(ASIA)分级均为E级,胸腰椎损伤分类及损伤程度评分系统(TLICS)评分均大于4分。根据随机原则分组,23例采用Wiltse肌间隙入路治疗(A组),另外23例采用传统后正中入路治疗(B组)。观察两组手术中出血量、术后引流量,术前及术后1、3、7 d测定肌酸激酶水平,术后视觉模拟量表(visual analogue scale,VAS)等资料,影像学测量X线侧位片上后凸角与椎体前缘高度,并进行比较分析。结果所有患者均得随访,时间9~14个月,平均(12.5±2.6)个月。术中出血量、术后引流量、术后肌酸激酶水平、术后疼痛VAS评分A组明显少于B组(P〈0.05)。两组方法术后均能明显矫正后凸角和椎体前缘高度。结论经Wiltse肌间隙入路内固定结合椎体内植骨是治疗胸腰椎骨折的有效方法,能有效恢复椎体高度和纠正后凸角度(cobb角),且能明显减少手术出血及椎旁肌损伤,减轻了术后腰背部疼痛。 Objective To investigate the clinical outcome of pedicle screw fixation combined with transpedicular interbody bone graftingfor the treatment of the throacolumbar fractures through Wiltse paraspinal approach.Methods This study included in May 2011 to October 2012 were single segmental pedicle screw internal fixation combined with vertebral body bone graft in46 cases of patients.Preoperative Spinal cord Injury(ASIA)class are E,thoracolumbar Injury classification and damage degree evaluation system(TLICS)scores were greater than4 points.According to the principle of random grouping,23 cases with Wiltse muscular clarance into the road treatment(group A)and the other 23 cases with traditional therapy(group B)after the middle of the road.Observe two groups of intraoperative blood loss,postoperative flow,preoperative and postoperative l,3,7 d determination of creatine kinase level,postoperative visual analog scale(VAS),imaging measurement of the protruding after X ray on a piece of Angle and height,fanterior and comparative analysis.Results All patients were followed up,time 9~14 months,an average(12.5±2.6)months.Intraoperative blood loss,preoperative and postoperative 1,3,7 d determination of creatine kinase level,Postoperative pain VAS score in group A was lower than that in group B(P〈0.05),Two groups of postoperative method are significantly after correction fanterior edge convex Angle and height,no significant statistical difference.Conclusion Pedicle screw fixation combined with transpedicular interbody bone grafting through Wiltse paraspinal approachis an effective method in treating thoracolumbar fractures..It can effectively rebuild the height of vertebral body and rectify posterior salient.Also,it can obviously reduce the operative time,operation wound and bleeding,and lessen the pain oflumbar and back.
出处 《内蒙古医学杂志》 2014年第8期897-900,共4页 Inner Mongolia Medical Journal
关键词 胸腰段骨折 Wiltse肌间隙入路 传统入路 内固定 植骨 thoracolumbar fracture wiltse paraspinal approach traditional approach fixation graft
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Neel A, Eli MB, Robe SB. Benefits of the paraspinal musclespar- ing approach versus the conventional midline approachfor posterior nonfusion stabilization: comparative analysisof clinical and func- tional outcomes[J]. SAS Journal, 2007, 1 : 93 - 99.
  • 2张文志,尚希福,段丽群,许翔,胡业丰,贺瑞,李旭.微创经皮与传统开放椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床对比研究[J].中国骨与关节外科,2012,5(2):106-111. 被引量:142
  • 3Kawaguehi Y, Yabuki S, Styf J, et al. Back muscle injury after- posterior lumbar spine surgery. Topographic evaluationof intra- muscular pressure and blood flow in the porcineback muscle during surgery[J]. Spine (PhilaPa1976), 1996, 21; 2 683- 2 688.
  • 4Hart R, Hettwer W, Liu Q, et al. Mechanical stiffness ofseg- mental versus nonsegmental pedicle screw constructs;the effect of cross - links[J]. Spine, 2006, 31 (2) 35 - 38.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Gelb D, Ludwig S, Karp JE, et al. Successful treatment of thoracolumbar fractures with short-segment pedicle instrumentation. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2010, 23 (5) : 293 - 301.
  • 2Verlaan JJ, Diekerhof CH, Buskens E, et al. Surgical treatment fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine : a systemic review of the literature on techniques, complications, and outcome. Spine, 2004, 29:803 -814.
  • 3Kim DY, Lee SH, Chung SK, et al. Comparison of muhifidus muscle atrophy and trunk extension muscle strength: percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation. Spine, 2005, 30 : 123 -129.
  • 4Wild MH, Gless M, Pliesehnegger C, et al. Five-year follow-up examination after purely minimally invasive posterior stabilization of tharacolumbar fracture~: a comparison of minimally ,invasive percutaneously and conventionally open treated patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2007, 127 : 335 -343.
  • 5Stevens KJ, Spenciner DB, Griffiths KL, et al. Comparison of minimally invasive and conventional open posterolateral lumbarfusion using magnetic resonance imaging and retraction pressure studies. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2006, 19:77 -86.
  • 6Magerl F. External skeletal fixation of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine. In Uhthoff HK, Stabl E, eds. Current concepts of external fixation of fracture. New York : Springer-Verlag, 1982 : 353 - 366.
  • 7Foley KT, Gupta SK. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine: preliminary clinical results. J Neuro Surg, 2002, 97:7 -12.
  • 8Palmisani M, Gasbarrini A, Brodano GB, et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous fixation in the treatment of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures. Eur Spine J, 2009, 18:71 -74.
  • 9Ni WF, Huang YX, Chi YL, et al. Percutaneous pediele screw fixation for neurological intact thoracolumbar burst fractures. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2010, 23 (8):530-537.
  • 10宓士军,刘长林,郑智慧,周广军,孙建筑,冯志永.经皮椎弓根内固定联合椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松椎体压缩骨折[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2011,26(1):59-60. 被引量:11

共引文献141

同被引文献89

  • 1张毅,钟德君.肌间隙入路结合伤椎置钉治疗胸腰段骨折34例分析[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(33):366-366. 被引量:1
  • 2李文生,陈永峰.椎旁肌间隙入路在治疗胸腰段骨折中的应用[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(17):140-140. 被引量:2
  • 3Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H .Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. A histologic and enzymaticanalysis. Spine. 1996;21 (8):941-944.
  • 4Wiltse LL, Bateman JG, Hutchinson RH, et al. The paraspina sacrospinalis- splitting approach to the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am.1968;50: 919-926.
  • 5吐尔洪江·吐尔迪,伍政疆.经肌间隙入路与正中常规切口入路植椎弓根钉治疗胸腰段骨折比较研究[J].中国保健营养(中旬刊),2013,23(8):157-157.
  • 6Talebian S, Hosseini M, Bagheri H, et al. Trunk muscle fatigue in subjects with a history of low back pain and a group of healthy controls measured by similarily index. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2011 ;24:17-22.
  • 7Kawaguchi , Yabuki S, Styf J, et al. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Topographic evaluation of intramuscular pressure and blood flow in the porcine back muscle during surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21: 2683-2688.
  • 8戴胡明,夏睿,杨家赵,等.椎旁肌间隙入路和传统后正中入路在治疗胸腰段骨折对比研究[C].//安徽省医学会骨科学第十三次学术会议论文集.2012:254.257.
  • 9Jiang XZ., Tian W, Liu B, et al. Comparison of a paraspinal approach with a percutaneous approach in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures with posterior ligamentous complex injury: a prospective randomized controlled trial.J int Med Res. 2012;40(4):1343-1356.
  • 10Scheer J K, Bakhsheshian J, Fakurnejad S, et al.Evidence-based medicine of traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures: a systematic review of operative management across 20 years[J].Global Spine J, 2015, 5 (1) : 73-82.

引证文献4

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部