摘要
"三农"问题的根本在于农村,而其焦点在于农地产权流转创新及其市场化程度,受制于历史习性、制度特性(制度模糊、产权权能虚置)等约束,我国的农地经营流转制度还很不完善。作为农民最重要的"财产",农地产权市场化流转的关键是解决农地资产产权的权能配置及其合约激励问题。不同的合约权利结构(S)决定经济制度及其变迁(I)的本质,而主体行为选择(C)的方向及其获得的绩效水平(P)既是制度创新的结果,又是引致制度变革的原因。文章整合多学科理论,以承包合约的静态与动态权利结构分析为起点,提出基于"权利结构—制度变迁—行为选择—绩效"之联动关系逻辑的"SICP"范式,为新形势下我国农地产权流转制度的实践创新提供理论框架和政策参考。
The root of the Chinese agricultural problem lies in rural areas ,but its focus is on the innovation of agricultural land property rights transferring and its degree of marketization .Subject to the historical habits and in-stitutional characteristics (“Fuzzy system”,empty of the functions of property rights ) and other constraints ,the agricultural land transfer system in China is still far from perfect .As the most important “property”of China’s o-verwhelming majority of farmers ,market-oriented agricultural land ownership ,allocation of the functions of prop-erty rights and the contract incentives are the key to the solution path of land property rights transferring .The dif-ferent contractual rights structure determines the nature of the economic system and its changes ,and the direction of the actors'behavior choices and their performance level not only are the result of institutional innovation ,but al-so the causes of institutional change .Starting from the analysis of the static and dynamic structure of the contractu-al rights ,and following the logical linkage relationship of “right structure-institutional change-behavior choices-performance”,and based on the integrated use of multi-disciplinary theories ,the paper created “SICP” analysis paradigm and tried to provide a theoretical framework and policy reference for the existing and future practice or in-novation in Chinese agricultural land transfer system .
出处
《西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
2014年第5期14-20,共7页
Journal of Northwest A&F University(Social Science Edition)
基金
国家自然科学基金项目(71262006)
教育部人文社会科学研究项目(10YJC790279)
新疆高校人文社会科学重点研究基地项目(XJEDU020112C02)
石河子大学高层次人才专项(RCSX201101和RCSX201002)
石河子大学“211工程”重点学科建设项目
关键词
农地流转制度
合约权利结构
制度变迁
主体行为选择
SICP范式
transfer system of agricultural land
structure of the contractual rights
institutional change
be-havior choice