法律漏洞填补的司法进路

The Judicial Approach to Legal Loophole-filling

为解决个案裁判的无序,走出司法能动性与法律安定性的二难困境,我国法律漏洞的填补需要探究统一的司法进路。在学理上,当前法律漏洞填补主要存在四种司法进路:原则解释的进路;法学方法论的进路;法官续造的进路与程序主义的进路。我国日渐盛行的是一种法学方法论的进路,这种进路有其自身的局限。超越法学方法论的进路局限,我国法律漏洞填补应然重构一种"能动平衡"的司法进路。这种司法进路应具有司法哲学的统一信奉;温和、审慎的理性裁量;动态开放的方法适用;社会后果的适度前瞻等基本品格。

To solye the problem of judicial decisions disorder in individual cases, and get out of the dilemma between judicial activism and legal stability, our country should explore the unified judicial approach to legal loophole-filling. In theory, there are chiefly four judicial approaches to legal loophole- filling： interpretation of principles, legal methodology, judge-made law and proceduralism. As to our country, the approach to legal methodology seem to be in vogue at the moment, but it has many limits. To transcend the limits, we should restructure an ＇ active and balanced＇ judicial approach which ought to have the basic characters ： the universal abidance of the judicial philosophy, the moderate and deliberate judicial decisions with ration, the dynamic and exoteric application of method, the moderate prospect of social consequences.