期刊文献+

题干输入模式对基于计算机听力理解选择题测试成绩的影响 被引量:4

The Effect of Stem-input Modes on Performance on a Computer-Based MultipleChoice Listening Comprehension Test
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文通过定量与定性相结合的研究方法,对计算机化听力理解选择题测试3种题干输入模式,即听觉输入模式、视觉(文本)输入模式和视听输入模式下的学生成绩和做题过程进行比较,结果表明,题干输入模式对考生听力成绩有显著影响,进一步的调查发现,题干输入模式对高水平受试无显著影响,对中水平受试的影响最为显著。研究还发现,在3种题干输入模式下,高中低水平学生使用不同的信息处理模式、听力策略和考试策略以及在工作记忆上的不同表现,是造成差异的主要原因。 This essay reports on an empirical study that compared the performance and processes of taking computer-based English listening comprehension MCQ test in audio stem-input mode, the visual stem-input mode and the audio and visual stem-input mode. It is found that the stem-input mode has no significant effect on the high proficiency students while it exerts more significant effect on the medium proficiency students. Different information processing approaches and test-taking strategies of the students at different proficiency-levels and their different capacity of working memory account for the main reasons of the effect.
作者 刘建达 许艺
出处 《中国外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第4期17-24,共8页 Foreign Languages in China
基金 教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目(11JJD740012)资助
关键词 题干输入模式 计算机化听力理解测试 多项选择题 信息处理 听力策略 multiple-choice questions stem-input modes CBLT information processing listening strategies
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Berne J. How does varying pre-listening activities affect second language listening comprehension? [J]. Hispania, 1995, 78(2): 316-329.
  • 2Buck G. The testing of listening comprehension: An introspective study [J]. Language Testing, 1991, 8(1): 67-91.
  • 3Buck, G. The appropriacy of psychometric measurement models for testing second language listening comprehension[J]. Language Testing, 1994 (11): 145-170.
  • 4Chiang, C. S. & Dunkel, P. The effects of speech modification, prior knowledge and listening proficiency on EFL lecture learning[J]. TESOL Quarterly, 1992, 26(2): 345-373.
  • 5Ellis, N. Language acquisition as rational contingency learning [J]. Applied Linguistics, 2006, 27: 1-24.
  • 6Just, M. A. & Carpenter, P A. The Psychology of Comprehension[M]. London: Allyn and Bacon, Inc, 1987: 453-482.
  • 7Just, M.A. & Carpenter, PA. A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory [J]. Psychological Review, 1992, 99 (1): 125-146.
  • 8Ockey, G. Construct implications of including still image or video in computer-based listening tests [J]. Language Testing, 2007, 24 (4): 517-537.
  • 9O'Malley, J., Chamot, A. & Kupper, L. Listening comprehension strategies in second language acquisition [J]. Applied Linguistics, 1989, 10(4): 418-437.
  • 10Sherman, J. The effect of question preview inlistening comprehension tests [J]. Language Testing, 1997(14): 185-213.

二级参考文献5

  • 1Ellis, N. C. 2002. Frequency effect in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, (2), 143-188.
  • 2Halliday, M. A. K. 1975. Learning how to mean. London: Edward Arnold.
  • 3Marian, V. & Neisser, U. 2000. Language-dependent recall of autobiographical memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, (3), 361-368.
  • 4Qi, L. 2005. Stakeholders' conflicting aims undermine the washback function of a high-stakes test. Language Testing, 22, (2),142-173.
  • 5Wang, C. & Lee, H.T. 1999. L2 Acquisition of conflation classes of prenominal adjectival palliciples. Language Learning, 49,( 1 ), 1 - 38.

共引文献45

同被引文献143

引证文献4

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部