期刊文献+

区间灰数群决策中决策者和属性权重确定方法 被引量:29

Method of determining weights of decision makers and attributes for group decision making with interval grey numbers
原文传递
导出
摘要 研究区间灰数信息的多属性群决策中决策者和属性的权重问题.为解决决策者给出的属性值蕴含的客观权重和主观权重冲突的问题,利用各方案与理想方案间的灰色关联度和极大熵原理建立规划模型求出属性的客观权重,并结合主观权重求得属性的综合权重;基于群体意见的一致性要求和信息分布的特点,依据极大熵思想及各决策者关于方案的综合指标值与群体综合指标均值间的灰色关联度建立模型求出各决策者的权重.在此基础上提出了区间灰数信息的群集结方法.算例验证了此方法较于其他方法更加合理. The problem of seeking weights of decision-makers and attributes is studied in multi-attribute group decision making with interval grey numbers.For avoiding conflict between subjective weights and objective ones computed from attributes’ values given by decision makers,the comprehensive weights are calculated by combining subjective weights and objective ones,where objective weights of attributes are obtained by using the maximum entropy model under the constrains of grey relation degree between the optimal project and every one.While,based on the degree of group consensus and information distribution,the weights of decision-makers are obtained by the maximum entropy thought and grey relation degree between every decision maker’s comprehensive evaluations and average group evaluations.Finally,an aggregation approach of group decision making with interval grey numbers is presented.The numerical example is proved to verify the proposed method is more reasonable than other methods.
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第9期2372-2378,共7页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家社科基金重大项目(10zd&014) 国家社科重点项目(12AZD102) 国家自然科学基金(71171112) 南京航空航天大学引进人才基金(1009-YAH14003)
关键词 群决策 属性权重 决策者权重 灰色关联 极大熵 group decision making attributes’ weights decision makers’ weights grey relational degree maximum entropy
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Shih H S, Shyur H J, Lee E S. An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making[J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2007, 45(7): 801-813.
  • 2Yu L, Lai K K. A distance-based group decision-making methodology for multi-person multi-criteria emergency decision support[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2011, 51(2): 307-315.
  • 3朱建军,张丽丽,梁燕华,李鹏.基于冲突主体不确定证据融合的灰靶决策方法[J].控制与决策,2012,27(7):1037-1041. 被引量:13
  • 4李鹏,刘思峰.基于灰色关联分析和D-S证据理论的区间直觉模糊决策方法[J].自动化学报,2011,37(8):993-998. 被引量:57
  • 5Pang J F, Liang J Y. Evaluation of the results of multi-attribute group decision-making with linguistic information[J]. Omega, 2012, 40(3): 294-301.
  • 6Zhou L G, Chen H Y, Liu J P. Generalized weighted exponential proportional aggregation operators and their applications to group decision making[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2012, 36(9): 4365-4384.
  • 7Yue Z L. Extension of TOPSIS to determine weight of decision maker for group decision making problems with uncertain information[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012, 39(7): 6343-6350.
  • 8Yue Z L. Application of the projection method to determine weights of decision makers for group decision making[J]. Scientia Iranica, 2012, 19(3): 872-878.
  • 9Chen Z P, Yang W. A new multiple attribute group decision making method in intuitionistic fuzz setting[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2011, 35(9): 4424-4437.
  • 10Li D F, Chen G H, Huang Z G. Linear programming method for multiattribute group decision making using IF sets[J]. Information Sciences, 2010, 180(9): 1591-1609.

二级参考文献72

共引文献160

同被引文献385

引证文献29

二级引证文献202

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部