期刊文献+

行政监管与反垄断互动演进的历史逻辑——以传统垄断行业的规制改革为视角 被引量:7

The Historical Logic of Interactive Evolution between Administrative Regulation and Antitrust——A Perspective Based on Regulatory Reformation of Traditional Monopoly Industries
下载PDF
导出
摘要 行政监管与反垄断是政府基于不同的政策目标而对传统垄断行业进行的外部干预。垄断行业的行政监管与反垄断规制经历了一个自由竞争下的反垄断规制、初期监管与反垄断的融合、严格监管下反垄断的弱化乃至退出、放松监管下反垄断法的再引入的演进历程。中国垄断行业的规制改革应当承接世界范围内放松监管、强化反垄断规制的整体趋势,不断放松准入和价格规制,弱化国有企业垄断并将其统一纳入反垄断规制,以解决垄断行业在供给、价格、效率等方面存在的诸多问题。 Administrative regulation and antitrust are external interventions from government,which has different policy objectives to conduct the traditional monopoly industries. From a historical perspective,administrative supervision and anti-monopoly regulation experienced a revolution. Specifically,the antitrust regulation initiated with integration between the regulation and supervision under a free environment. Later on,it went through antitrust deregulation and even exiting strategies under a strict environment. Last,it is a reintroduction of antitrust regulatory policies under less restricted environment. In our country,the regulatory reformation of monopoly industries should induce an overall trend from worldwide,which is deregulation against this industry. More specifically,it is to strengthen anti-monopoly regulation,to continue a less supervision environment,to induce a loose access to industry,to maintain less price regulation and to weaken the influence of state-owned monopoly enterprises and integrate them into an unified anti-monopoly regulation,so that it resolves many problems in the monopoly industries such as supply,price and efficiency issues.
作者 郭宗杰
机构地区 暨南大学法学院
出处 《华南师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第4期124-130,183,共7页 Journal of South China Normal University:Social Science Edition
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"行业监管与反垄断互动演变的历史逻辑"(09CFX043)
关键词 垄断行业 行政监管 反垄断法 国有企业 规制改革 monopoly industries administrative supervision antitrust law state-owned enterprises regulatory reformation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献33

  • 1陈晓波,徐云国,周亚夫,公丕祥.美国反垄断法及其政策述评[J].江苏社会科学,1996(5):40-45. 被引量:24
  • 2王天习.论美国反托拉斯法“模糊性”的三大表现——从微软垄断案说起[J].法学评论,2002,20(1):106-114. 被引量:15
  • 3[3](美)罗依·桑普森,等.运输经济--实践、理论与政策[M].北京:经济管理出版社,1994,297-317.
  • 4[4]于军.网络型产业的经济特征与规制改革--以铁路为例[C].北京:社会科学文献出版社.2000,200-209.
  • 5James R. Withrow. Jr. Did Sherman Want to Break the "Trusts"? [A]. Theodore P. Kovaleff. The Antitrust Impulse Vol. II, An Economic, Historical, and Legal Analysis [C]. New York: M. E. Sharpe, 1994.
  • 6John T. Flynn. God' s Gold : The Story of Rockefeller and His Times [ M ]. New York : Harcourt and Brace Company, 1932.
  • 7Werner Troesken. Did the Trusts Want a Federal Antitrust Law?. An Event Study of State Antitrust Enforcement and Passage of the Sherman Act [ A]. Jac C. Heckelman, John C. Moorhouse, Robert M. Whaples. Public Choice Interpretations of American Economic History [ C ]. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.
  • 8Robert E. Litan and Carl Shapiro. Antitrust Policy in the Clinton Administration [ A ]. Jeffrey A. Frankel, Peter R. Orszag. American Economic Policy in the 1990s [ C]. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2002.
  • 9Rudolph J. R. Peritz. Competition Policy in America, 1888- 1992: History, Rhetoric, Law [M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
  • 10[美]詹姆斯·威拉德·赫斯特.《美国史上的市场与法律--各利益间的不同交易方式》,郑达轩等译,法律出版社2006年版,第121页.

共引文献14

同被引文献73

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部