期刊文献+

微型钢板与克氏针在掌指骨开放性骨折急诊治疗中的疗效比较 被引量:15

THE CURATIVE EFFECT COMPARISON OF MINIATURE STEEL PLATE WITH GRAM AND NEEDLE IN PALM FINGER OPEN FRACTURES IN THE EMERGENCY TREATMENT
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析微型钢板与克氏针二种不同内固定方法在急诊治疗掌、指骨开放性骨折的临床效果。方法回顾分析该科2011年7月—2013年12月经手术治疗的掌指骨开放性骨折患者91例(126处),根据内固定治疗的方式分为微型钢板组和克氏针组,术后随访6~12个月,平均8.2个月,分析二组骨折愈合情况、临床愈合时间、术后并发症及功能情况,进行疗效价。结果微型钢板组骨折愈合率为96.8%,克氏针组骨折愈合率为95.2%,二组差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);微型钢板组临床愈合时间短于克氏针组(P〈0.05);二种内固定方法均有不同程度的并发症,各种并发症的发生率有差异;按照TAFS评分标准评定优良率,克氏针组与微型钢板组患者掌骨关节活动的功能优良率比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05),微型钢板组的临床疗效明显好于克氏针组,近节指骨和中节指骨功能优良率,二组间差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论克氏针和微型钢板内固定适应证并不完全相同,均有各自优缺点,在急诊条件下开放性掌指骨折的内固定方法应根据骨折的具体情况(部位、类型、软组织损伤情况)而定,以牢固可靠为原则,进行灵活选择,才会达到最好的临床效果。 Objective To analyze the clinical effect of needle and miniature steel plate with two different internal fixation methods in the emergency department for the treatment of palm,finger bone open fracture.Methods Totally 91 cases of palm phalanx of surgical treatment of open fractures patients from July 2011 to December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed.According to the internal fixation treatment way of the needle,the patients were divided into micro steel group and gram needle group,the patients were followed up for 6-12 months after treatment,with an average of 8.2 months.The fracture healing,clinical healing time,postoperative complications and function were analyzed in the two groups,then the curative effect was evaluated.Results The fracture healing rate in micro steel group was 96.8%,95.2%in gram needle group,there was no statistical difference between the groups(P〉0.05).Clinical healing time of miniature steel plate group was short than semi-detached-sceptical like needle group(P〈0.05).Two kinds of internal fixation methods showed different degrees complications,there were differences in the incidence of various complications between two groups.In accordance with the TAFS grading standard rate,the metacarpal joint activity function of patients in two groups was different(P〈0.05),the clinical curative effect of mini plate group was obviously better than semi-detached-sceptical like needle group,while the nearly section phalanx and finger function were no statistically significant difference between the two groups(P〉0.05).Conclusions Gram and micro needle plate internal fixation of indication are not exactly the same,both have their respective advantages and disadvantages.Under the condition of emergency,open palm phalanx fracture internal fixation methods should be selected according to the actual circumstances of the fracture(area),type,soft tissue injury.Based on principles of solid and reliable to choice,will reach the best clinical effect.
出处 《中国煤炭工业医学杂志》 2014年第10期1549-1552,共4页 Chinese Journal of Coal Industry Medicine
基金 河北省科技支撑项目(编号:102761101)
关键词 骨折 掌指骨 开放性 急诊 内固定 微型钢板 交叉克氏针 Palm finger bone open fracture Emergency Internal fixation Miniature steel plate The cross needle
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献12

  • 1Muller ME 荣国威(译).骨折内固定学,第1版[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.1-48.
  • 2Botte MJ,Davis JL,Rose BA,et al.Complications of the smooth pin fixation of fractures and dislocations in the hand and wrist.Clin Orthop Relat Res,1992,276:194-201.
  • 3Ouellette EA,Freeland AE.Use of the minicondylar plate in metacarpal and phalangeal fractures.Clin Orthop Relat Res,1996,327:38-46.
  • 4[1]Clinic assessment committee total active flexion scale,American society for surgery of the hand report[J].New Orlaens:Clinical Assessment committee,1976.35-37.
  • 5顾玉东.如何治疗手部骨折-评AO微型钢板的应用价值.中华手外科杂志,2002,18(2):65-65.
  • 6张明军,范晓宇,马玉林.微型钢板在掌指骨骨折治疗中的应用[J]中华手外科杂志,1999(03).
  • 7ConltonCL ,,FernandezA,HolzU ,etal.AOprinciplesoffracturemanagement[]..
  • 8Clinic Assessment Committee.Total active flexion scale,American society for surgery of the hand report[]..1976
  • 9潘达德,顾玉东,侍德,寿奎水.中华医学会手外科学会上肢部分功能评定试用标准[J].中华手外科杂志,2000,16(3):130-135. 被引量:4011
  • 10周伯禧,林高田,林森源,张维军,洪绍鸿,江宏达.手掌骨折内外固定器之刚度比较[J].医用生物力学,1995,10(3):150-156. 被引量:10

共引文献329

同被引文献109

  • 1原贵兴,张兴利.微型钢板与克氏针内固定治疗掌指骨骨折的效果分析[J].中国实用医刊,2019,46(13):63-65. 被引量:10
  • 2李健挺,王云飞.微型钢板与克氏针内固定治疗掌指骨骨折疗效与经济评价[J].宁夏医科大学学报,2013,35(6):709-712. 被引量:28
  • 3郭全功,王国选,付涛,马军,丛伟.微型钢板内固定治疗掌指骨骨折[J].兵团医学,2013(2):18-18. 被引量:2
  • 4唐明杰,金东旭,杨星光,王建华,张长青,曾炳芳.AO微型钢板治疗掌指骨延迟愈合或骨不连[J].临床骨科杂志,2007,10(1):46-47. 被引量:3
  • 5顾玉东.如何治疗手部骨折-评AO微型钢板的应用价值.中华手外科杂志,2002,18(2):65-65.
  • 6Schaefer M,Siebert HR.Finger and metacarpal fractures. Surgical and nonsurgical treatment procedures. I [J].Un- fallchirurg, 2000, 103 (6) : 482-494.
  • 7Schaefer M, Siebert HR. Finger and middle hand frac- tures. Surgical and non surgical treatment procedtlres [J].Unfallchirurg, 2000,103 : 582 - 292.
  • 8Biz C,Iacobellis C. Comparison of percutaneous intramed- ullary Kirschner wire and interfragmentary screw fixation of displaced extra-articular metacarpal fracturesI-J]. Acta Bio Med,2014,85(3) :252-264.
  • 9Zemirline A, Vaiss L, Lebailly F, et al. The MetaHUS ((R)) fixation system versus pinning and plating in 5th metacarpal neck fractures[J]. Chir Main, 2014,33 (3) : 207-210.
  • 10Facca S, Ramdhian R, Pelissier A, et al. Fifth metacarpal neck fracture fixation:Locking plate versus K-wire.9 [J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2010,96 (5) : 506 -512.

引证文献15

二级引证文献162

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部