期刊文献+

气候政策不确定条件下的发电投资优化模型 被引量:4

Optimization model of generation investment under uncertainty of climate policy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在温室气体减排背景下,本文研究了不确定条件下的大型发电企业的投资决策问题.采用实物期权方法评估发电企业投资燃煤发电+CCS技术,天然气联合循环发电(NGCC)+CCS技术,风电技术的收益,并采用蒙特卡洛模拟法得到多种场景下的投资收益分布,之后采用投资组合优化模型得到最优的发电组合决策.该模型同时考虑了投资者的收益、主观风险偏好和碳减排目标.情景分析所得结论如下:相比风险中性电力企业,谨慎电力企业的最优组合决策中天然气发电比例减小,煤电比例增加;国家碳减排政策走势、行业CO_2减排目标、燃料价格不确定性及CCS技术的投资成本是影响发电企业投资决策的主要因素.对该模型的情景分析结果可以为国家宏观决策提供依据. In the context of greenhouse mitigation, this paper analyzes the investment decision of large-scale power company under uncertainties who can choose to invest in coal-fired power generation with CCS, natural gas combined cycle power generation (NGCC) with CCS or wind power technology. We establish a real option model to evaluate the profit of generating investment. Using Monte Carlo simulation, we get the profit distribution under a variety of scenarios and then put them into the portfolio model for analysis which takes into account the investor's income, subjective risk appetite and carbon reduction targets. The results of scenario analysis are as follows: compared to risk-neutral power company, the cautious power company will decrease investment in NGCC and increase investment in coal-fired power generation. National carbon emissions policy trends, industry CO2 reduction targets, uncertainties of fuel price and cost of investment in CCS technology are major factors of affecting investment decisions. The analysis results can be used for national macro decision- making.
作者 亢娅丽 朱磊
出处 《系统工程学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第5期713-724,共12页 Journal of Systems Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金重大国际合作与交流资助项目(71210005)
关键词 碳减排 实物期权 投资组合 谱风险 carbon emission real options investment portfolio spectral risk
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Awerbuch S. Market-based IRP: It's easy[J]. The Electricity Journal, 1995, 8(3): 50-67.
  • 2Awerbuch S. Investing in photovoltaics: Risk, accounting and the value of new Technology[J]. Energy Policy, 2000, 28(14): 1023- 1035.
  • 3Krey B, Zweifel P. Efficient Electricity Portfolios for Switzerland and the United States[R]. Zurich: University of Zurich, SOl Working Paper No. 0602, 2006.
  • 4Awerbuch S. Towards a finance-oriented valuation of conventional and renewable energy sources in Ireland[R]. Sussex: University of sussex, 2004.
  • 5Roques F A, Newbery D M, Nuttall W J. Fuel mix diversification incentives in liberalized electricity markets: A mean-variance portfolio theory approach[J]. Energy Economics, 2008, 30(4): 1831-1849.
  • 6Fuss S, Szolgayova J, Khabarov N. et.al. Renewables and climate change mitigation: Irreversible energy investment under uncertainty and portfolio effects[J]. Energy Policy, 2012, 40: 59-68.
  • 7Min K J, Wang C H. Generation Planning for Inter-related Generation Units: A Real Options Approach[C]//IEEE Power Engineer- ing Society Summer Meeting. Seattle, 2000: 2261-2265.
  • 8Davis G, Owens B. Optimizing the level of renewable electric RD expenditures using real options analysis[J]. Energy Policy, 2003, 31(15): 1589-1608.
  • 9Laurikka H, Koljonen T. Emissions trading and investment decisions in the power sector: A case study in Finland[J]. Energy Policy, 2006, 34(9): 1063-1074.
  • 10Laufikka H. Option value of Ggasification technology within an emissions trading scheme[J]. Energy Policy. 2006, 34(18): 3916- 3928.

同被引文献33

引证文献4

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部