期刊文献+

蒙太格语法框架下的汉语被动句分析

Montagovian Constructions of Passive Sentences in Mandarin Chinese
下载PDF
导出
摘要 被动句作为汉语特殊句式,且具有汉语的特色,一直是语言学家研究的热点,但以往研究都只是从分类和句法角度进行分析,鲜有将被动句的句法和语义相结合而形成同步推演。本研究将被动句分为两类:一类是基本被动模式,描绘事物的状态;一类是被动变化模式,带"被"字的被动句,描绘受事状态的变化。并分别对这两类都被动句进行蒙太格语法基本原则的生成解读和Partee的转换解读。最后形成对被动句的句法语义的同步推演,并体现了乔姆斯基的深、表层结构之分。 Passive, an important sentence pattern in Mandarin Chinese is one of the most distinctive sentence patterns to show linguistic features specific to Chinese. Passive has been an essential part in urging the development of Generative grammar and other sort of grammars. The present work will dwell on syntactic construction for Chinese passives together with their more attractive semantic interpretation. Four subparts, as listed below, are included. The first part serves as an introduction to an explanation of possible problems for passive analysis and the reason for adopting Montague grammar( MG for short) as our mechanical tool, the latter of which will be further explicated in the part followed. Then in the third part, detailed Montagovian analysis over 12 Chinese passives are given, where the semantic interpretations are unfolded from two perspectives: one, some sorts of Chinese passives arise from syntactic derivation, which needs some basic Montagovian rules to cover; two, other sorts are residue of transformation, which means certain transformational rules are necessary. The fourth part concludes the present study with its academic significance.
出处 《外国语文》 北大核心 2014年第4期62-66,共5页 Foreign Languages and Literature
基金 教育部人文社科项目"面向自然语言信息处理的组合范畴语法研究"(12YJCZH153)的阶段性成果
关键词 蒙太格语法 被动句 范畴 基本规则 转换生成语法 Montague Grammar passives categories basic rules Transformational Grammar
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Chomsky, N. Questions of Form and Interpretation [ J ]. Un- guistic Analysis, 1975 ( 1 ).
  • 2Dowty, D. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar[ M ]. Dor- drecht: Reidel, 1979.
  • 3Partee, B.H. Montague Grammar [ C]//Handbook of Log- ic and Language. Amsterdam and Cambridge, MA: Elsevi- er and the MIT Press, 1977:5 -91.
  • 4Partee, B. H. The Development of Formal Semantics in Lin- guistic Theory [ C l// The Handbook of Conlemportary Se-mantic. Oxford : Blackwell Publishers Ltd. , 1997 : 11 - 38.
  • 5Thomason, Richmond H. Formal Philosophy:Selected Papers of Richard Montague [ C ]. New Haven : Yale University Press, 1974.
  • 6蒋严 潘海华.形式语义学导论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1998..
  • 7邹崇理.多模态范畴逻辑研究[J].哲学研究,2006(9):115-121. 被引量:12
  • 8邹崇理.从逻辑到语言——Barbara H.Partee访谈录[J].当代语言学,2007,9(2):151-165. 被引量:12

二级参考文献106

  • 1吴平.2005年.《逻辑语义分析》.
  • 2Dosen, K. , 1992, " A brief survey of frames for the Lambek calculus", Z. Math. Logik Grundlag. Math. 38.
  • 3Moortgat, M. , 1988, Categorial Investgations, Foris Publication.
  • 41997, "Categorical type logic", in Handbook of Logic and Language, J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.) ,pp. 93-177, Cambridge, MA. :The MIT Press.
  • 52002, " Categorial grammar and formal semantics", Article #231, Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, Nature Publishing Group, Macmillan Publisher Ltd..
  • 6Moot, R. , 2001, "Proof nets for linguistic analysis", PhD thesis, Utrecht University.
  • 7Partee,B.H.1982.Belief-sentences and the limits of semantics.In S.Peters and E.Saarinen,eds.,Processes,Beliefs,and Questions.Dordrecht:Reidel.Pp.87-106.
  • 8Partee,B.H.1997[1983].Uniformity vs.versatility:The genitive,a case study.Appendix to T.Janssen,1997,Compositionality.In J.van Benthem and A.ter Meulen,eds.1997,464-70.
  • 9Partee,B.H.1984.Compositionality.In F.Landman and F.Veltman,eds.,Varieties of Formal Semantics.Dordrecht:Foris.Pp.281-312.
  • 10Partee,B.H.1988.Semantic facts and psychological facts.Mind and Language 3:43-52.

共引文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部