期刊文献+

MOOC背景下基于推荐机制的提高同伴互评效果的研究 被引量:20

A Study Based on Recommendation Mechanism to Improve the Effect of Peer Assessment in the Context of MOOC
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着Web2.0技术的不断发展,大规模开放在线课程(MOOCs)以其免费、方便、省时、高质量和不受时间和空间限制等特征迅速在全球兴起。然而,作为一种新兴的课程模式,用于评估学习者作业的同伴互评环节由于设置过于简单,存在评阅者态度粗鲁、评价效率低下等问题,并不能取得令人满意的效果。针对如何提高大规模开放课程中同伴互评的效果这一问题,通过建立基于推荐机制的提高同伴互评效果的推荐模型,为学生作业分配较为合适的评阅人,从而达到优化同伴互评过程并提高学习者满意度的目的。 With the development of Web2.0, MOOCs have been on a rapid rise around the world which are featured by free, con-venient, time saving, high quality and not restricted by time and space.However, as a kind of new courses, the phase of peer assess-ment which is used for assessing learners'work has some problems such as some students being treated rudely and low efficiency of as-sessment.Thus, a satisfying result cannot be attained.Researches on this problem are not very much.Therefore, this paper focus on improving the effect of learners'satisfaction and trying to build a recommendation model, which is used for assigning submissions to the suitable learners so that the process of peer assessment can be optimized and learners'satisfaction can be improved.
作者 许云红 王如
机构地区 昆明理工大学
出处 《现代远距离教育》 CSSCI 2014年第5期17-21,共5页 Modern Distance Education
关键词 MOOCs 同伴互评 推荐 满意度 MOOCs Peer Assessment Recommendation Satisfaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1韩锡斌,葛文双,周潜,程建钢.MOOC平台与典型网络教学平台的比较研究[J].中国电化教育,2014(1):61-68. 被引量:337
  • 2Colman,D. MOOC Interrupted: Top 10 Reasons OurReaders Didn' t Finish a Massive Open Online Course [ EB/ OL] http://www, openculture, com/2013/04/10_reasons_you didnt_complete a mooc. html.
  • 3Goldfinch, N. F. J. , Student Peer Assessment in High- er Education: A Meta -Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks [ J ]. Review of Educational Research, 2000 : p. 287 - 322.
  • 4Topping, K., Peer Assessment between Students in Eolleges and Universities [ J ]. Review of Educational Research, 1998: p. 249-276.
  • 5刘旨峰.网络同侪互评的探讨、实施、评估与增进实施品质的建议[C].实践大学:2002电子商务与数位生活研讨会.2002(http://forum.totematncu.info/index.php?show-topic=115).
  • 6姜蔺,韩锡斌,程建钢.MOOCs学习者特征及学习效果分析研究[J].中国电化教育,2013(11):54-59. 被引量:205
  • 7Karen, S. , Virtual interaction : Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous on- line courses[J]. Distance Education, 2001. 22(2) : p. 306 - 331.
  • 8Piech C, H.J. ,Chen Z, et al. , Tuned models of peer assessment in MOOCs[ J]. 2013.
  • 9Landauer, T. K., McNamara, D. S., Dennis, S., and W. Kintsch, Handbook of Latent Semantic Analysis2007 [M].
  • 10Gatian, A. W. , Is user satisfaction a valid measure of system effectiveness [ J ]. Information & Management, 1994 : p. 119 -131.

二级参考文献21

  • 1韩锡斌,刘英群,周潜(2012).数字化学习环境的设计与开发[M].北京:中央广播电视大学出版社.
  • 2Coursera[EB/OL]. http://www.coursera.org,2013 -09-10.
  • 3edX[EB/OL].https://www.edx.org/about-us, 2013-09-10.
  • 4Udacity[EB/OL]. https://www.udacity.com/how-it-works, 2013-09- 10.
  • 5Moodle[EB/OL]. http://docs.raoodle.org/25/en/About_Moodle, 2013- 05-24.
  • 6Moodle Stats[EB/OL].https://moodle.org/stats/, 2013-02-02.
  • 7Sakai [EB/OL].http://www.sakaiproject.org/about-sakai, 2013-09-10.
  • 8Drupal[EB/OL].http://drupal.org/about, 2013-07-08.
  • 9Wikipedia. Blackboard Inc[EB/OL]. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Blackboard_Inc,2013-08-27.
  • 10清华大学教育技术研究所.清华教育在线创新应用模式[EB/OL].http://tnet 1 .theti.org/evaluate/infoSingleArticle.do?articleId= 1065&col umnld=1022, 2012-09-12.

共引文献525

同被引文献358

引证文献20

二级引证文献102

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部