期刊文献+

腰背肌协调性测试的阻力量选择

Choice of Resistance Amount for Lumbar Muscles' Coordination Test
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同的阻力量选择对腰背肌协调性测试结果可信度的影响。方法由1名测试者在1周内分别对30例青年腰痛男子进行2次腰背肌协调性测试。在每次测试中,受试者随机完成5 kg、10 kg和15 kg 3种阻力量的测试,测试内容包括向心运动平均值、向心运动偏移值、离心运动平均值和离心运动偏移值4项。应用组内相关系数(ICC)对3个阻力量组的4项测试结果进行重测信度评价。结果 5 kg阻力量组ICC分别为0.303、0.500、0.358和0.360;10 kg阻力量组ICC分别为0.449、0.382、0.365和0.272;15 kg阻力量组ICC分别为0.453、0.442、0.614和0.411。结论施加15 kg阻力,腰背肌协调性测试具有较好的重测信度。 Objective To explore the effect of different resistance amount on the reliability of the lumbar muscles' coordination test.Methods 30 young male adults participated the lumbar muscles' coordination test twice within 1 week by the same tester. In each test, the subjects took 5 kg, 10 kg and 15 kg of resistance randomly. The index included mean of concentric motion, deviation of concentric motion,mean of eccentric motion and deviation of eccentric motion. Intra-class correlation coefficient(ICC) for these 4 test results were applied to evaluate the reliability of those tests. Results The ICCs of the 4 test results were 0.303, 0.500, 0.358 and 0.360 respectively in the 5 kg of resistance group, 0.449, 0.382, 0.365 and 0.272 respectively in the 10 kg of resistance group, and 0.453, 0.442, 0.614 and 0.411 respectively in the 15 kg of resistance group. Conclusion The test-retest reliability can be satisfied in the lumbar muscles' coordination test with 15 kg of resistance.
出处 《中国康复理论与实践》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第10期971-974,共4页 Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
关键词 腰背肌 协调性测试 阻力量 lumbar muscle coordination test amount of resistance
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Tidstrand J, Horneij E. Inter-rater reliability of three standard- ized functional tests in patients with low back pain [J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2009, 10: 58.
  • 2Millisdotter M, Stromqvist B, J6nsson B. Proximal neuromus- cular impairment in lumbar disc herniation [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2003, 28(12): 1281-1289.
  • 3Shum GL, Crosbie J, Lee RY. Effect of low back pain on the ki- nematics and joint coordination of the lumbar spine and hip during sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2005, 30(17): 1998-2004.
  • 4Leinonen V, Kankaanpaa M, Luukkonen M, et al. Lumbar para-spinal muscle function, perception of lumbar position, and pos- tural control in disc hemiationrelated back pain [J]. Spine (Phi- la Pa 1976), 2003, 28(8): 842-848.
  • 5Wang Q, Sharma N, Johnson M, et al. Adaptive Inverse optimal neuromuscular electrical stimulation [J]. IEEE Trans Cybern, 2013, 43(6): 1710-1718.
  • 6Hussain S, Xie SQ, Jamwal PK, et al. An intrinsically compli- ant robotic orthosis for treadmill training [J]. Med Eng Phys, 2012, 34(10): 1448-1453.
  • 7Maffiuletti NA, Bizzini M, Schatt S, et al. A multi-joint low- er-limb tracking-trajectory test for the assessment of motor co- ordination [J]. Neurosci Lett, 2005, 384(1-2): 106-111.
  • 8Ridderinkhof KR. Neurocognitive mechanisms of percep- tion- action coordination: A review and theoretical integra- tion [J]. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2014, 24(5): 7608-7634.
  • 9Yamada T, Demura S. The relationship of force output charac- teristics during a sit-to-stand movement with lower limb mus- cle mass and knee joint extension in the elderly [J]. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 2010, 50(3): e46-50.
  • 10Campy RM, Coelho AJ, Pincivero DM. EMG-torque relation- ship and reliability of the medial and lateral hamstring mus- cles [J]. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2009, 41(11): 2064-2071.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部