摘要
黑格尔和丹托的"艺术终结论"并未指出艺术彻底的终止或消亡,但确实揭示了艺术所面临的困境。从当下的艺术发展现状来看,"终结"的不是艺术整体,而是现代以来的艺术形式,是宣称"为艺术而艺术"的艺术自律论。在日常生活与艺术界限消弭的今天,艺术不再是一个可以明确界定的范畴。日常生活审美化所带来的艺术与生活的双向互动,正切实改变着艺术的当代走向。后现代文化语境为艺术创造了探寻自身存在价值的契机,与生活合流、与技术结合为艺术提供了多元化的呈现方式。
'The end of art'advanced by Hegel and Danto did not indicate the termination or extinction of art,but it does reveal the adverse conditions faced by art. According to the perspective of contemporary artistic development status,'the end'is not the art as a whole but the modern form and the self-discipline theory declaring 'art for art'. Nowadays,art cannot be clearly defined because of the eliminated boundaries between art and daily life. The Aestheticization of everyday life brought the interaction of art and life and changes the direction of contemporary art. Postmodern culture created the opportunity to explore the existence value of art,and it offered the diversified presentation of art by combining with the life and technology.
出处
《浙江社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第11期126-131,159,共6页
Zhejiang Social Sciences
基金
浙江省社会科学界联合会研究课题(2014N121)成果
关键词
艺术终结
日常生活审美化
后现代
技术
设计
the end of art
the aestheticization of everyday life
postmodernism
technology
design