期刊文献+

死刑控制与最高人民法院的功能定位 被引量:6

Control of the Death Penalty and Function of the Supreme People's Court
原文传递
导出
摘要 死刑控制与最高人民法院的关系是社会各界关注的热点问题。分析表明,2007年以来最高人民法院全面收回死刑复核权,对其自身造成了一系列影响;最高人民法院的内部结构与实际功能,由此发生了深刻变化。这些变化并不完全符合现代法治理念下最高人民法院的功能定位。未来应该在考虑政治与社会条件的基础上,有步骤地改造最高人民法院在死刑控制方面的工作职能与方式,以减轻最高人民法院不必要的工作负担与资源消耗,促进最高人民法院将更多的资源用于应对更加宏观、复杂的问题。 The full recovery by the Supreme Court of the authority to review and approve death sentences in 2007 has to a certain extent reduced the number of death sentence, but it also had a profound impact on the Supreme Court itself. Firstly, the organizational structure of the Supreme Court has changed. The death sentence review body becomes the most important trial section and judges responsible for the review of death sentences the largest group of personnel of the Supreme Court. Secondly, the functional system of the Coui't has changed. Because of the drastic increase in the number of death sentence review cases, the individual case handling function of the Court becomes more powerful and prominent, resulting in the functions of the Court and the rise of the Court at the micro level. These e transformation of the status of and relationship between various the position of the individual criminal cases handling function of hanges are not completely function of the Supreme Court under the modem system of the death sentence review body is not in conformity with the status in conformity with the organization and rule of law. Firstly, the expansion of of the Supreme Court as an elite court.Secondly, the comprehensive and painstaking intervention in all death penalty cases by the Supreme Court could undermine the Court' s ability to deal with more important issues and impede the realization of the macro-functions of the Supreme Court, such as unification of the of judicial policies. In the future, the Court should reform its functions and to the review of death sentences in a step-by-step way in light of changing legal system and formation working mode with respect political and social conditions.
作者 左卫民
机构地区 四川大学法学院
出处 《法学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第6期192-205,共14页 Chinese Journal of Law
基金 国家2011计划司法文明协同创新中心研究成果.
关键词 最高人民法院 死刑控制 死刑复核权 the Supreme People' s Court, control of death penalty, review of death sentences
  • 相关文献

参考文献51

  • 1《云南晋宁连环杀人犯被处决4年杀害11人并分尸灭迹,一审宣判后未上诉》,《南方都市报》2013年1月11日.
  • 2《随身带300万元银行卡竟成"夺命卡"东莞亿万富姐遭枪匪勒杀》,《信息时报》2012年6月20日A12版.
  • 3胡新桥.《因婚姻纠纷杀死岳父母一家四口湖北天门灭门案凶手被执行死刑》,《法制日报》2012年2月17日第8版.
  • 4张春霞.《最高法院上诉审判权之比较研究》,载左卫民等.《最高法院研究》,法律出版社2004年版.
  • 5最高人民法院发布的指导性案例4号,11号.
  • 6刘新魁,张凝.法国最高法院的机构设置与职能[J].法律适用,2003(12):64-69. 被引量:7
  • 7胡铭.大区巡回法院:一个现实主义的进路——以死刑复核程序为例的分析[J].浙江社会科学,2012(9):60-67. 被引量:8
  • 8《河南安阳公交车杀人案罪犯周江波被执行死刑》,http://www.china.com.cn/news/2014-03/26/COntent.31906523.htm,2014年4月10日访问.
  • 9龚袁晓.《最高人民法院首次在威远法院对死刑犯进行提讯》,http://neijiang.scol.com.cn/fzIlj/content/2012-10/29/content-51296952.htm?node=154537,2014年4月10日访问.
  • 10日本刑事诉讼法第405条.

共引文献392

同被引文献269

引证文献6

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部