期刊文献+

美国对日政策内在矛盾及地区战略影响分析 被引量:3

The Intrinsic Paradox of U.S.-Japan Policy and Its Impact
原文传递
导出
摘要 近年来美国对日政策的总体趋向,是放手日本摆脱政治约束、在强化军事实力的基础上扮演更重要的安全角色。支持日本"恢复在安全领域的主权权利"以及对中日钓鱼岛争端的表态更具倾向性,是其最新表现。这一政策内含矛盾:它与美国对日总体政策缺乏整合性,与构建中美"新型大国关系"存在结构性、"成长型"冲突,与美国地区战略的其他部分不兼容,与美国对战略整体效果的追求相背离。美国在安全上的"纵日"政策,导致亚太秩序建构失去方向,面临分裂、对立的风险。亚太地区安全中的"日本因素"上浮,安全态势更趋复杂。美国自身也面临战略困境,地区控制力开始受到质疑。 The general trend of U. S. Japan policy in recent years is characterized with easing political restriction on Japan and strengthening its role in security cooperation through military capacity building. The trend has become even more obvious in the second term of Obama administration, with U. S. support for Japan' s "restoration of sovereignty in terms of security" and positions on the disputes over Diaoyu Islands as the new reflection. There is an intrinsic paradox in U. S. Japan Policy, for the reason that the policy, incompatible with American regional policy and the goal of general strategic design, can not be integrated with American overall policy towards Japan and is confronted with U. S. effort of building a new type of partnership between big powers with China. American "indulgence" of Japan in security policy has resulted in the lost of direction of regional order building in East Asia, the danger of division and conflicts and the growing complexity of regional security with the rising of "Japan factor". U.S. itself is also faced with the strategic dilemma, with its controlling power in this region being questioned.
作者 杨伯江
出处 《日本学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第6期33-47,共15页 Japanese Studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Ralph A. Cossa, "United States -Japan: Beyond the Defense Guideline", Pacific Forum CSIS, June 29, 2001, http: //www. esis. org/media/csis/pubs/pac0126, pdf.
  • 2周琪.美国对日安全合作政策对中日关系的影响[J].当代亚太,2009(2):20-37. 被引量:1
  • 3"The U. S. - Japan Alliance : Getting Asia Right Through 2020", http : //www. csis. org/media/csis/ pubs/070216_asia2020, pdf.
  • 4顾静,李雪飞.从“阿米蒂奇报告Ⅱ”看美国亚洲战略新动向[J].现代国际关系,2007(4):49-52. 被引量:6
  • 5http: //www. defense, gov/QDR/images/QDR as of 12Febl0_1000. pdf.
  • 6http : //www. defense, gov/home/features/2014/0314_ sdr/qdr, aspx.
  • 7廉德瑰.简析美国钓鱼岛政策的模糊性[J].现代国际关系,2012(10):49-54. 被引量:11
  • 8Niv Horesh, Hyun Jin Kim, Get Ready, "America: The Winds of Change Are Blowing in East Asia", The National Interest, October 20, 2014.
  • 9Peter Ennis, "Why Japan Still Matters ", Brookings Northeast Asia Commentary, Number 49, May 16, 2011.
  • 10Nicholas D. Wright, James L Schoff, "China and Japan' s Real Problem: Enter the Fairness Dilemma", The National Interest, November 2, 2014.

二级参考文献75

  • 1沈大伟,朱杰进.中国、美国与正在演变中的亚洲秩序[J].外交学院学报,2004(4):47-50. 被引量:12
  • 2金灿荣,周鑫宇.美国东亚政策的新特点[J].国际观察,2006(5):11-20. 被引量:5
  • 3Michael Green and Nicholas Szechenyi, Common Values: A New Agenda for U. S. -Japan for U. S. -Japan Relations, Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 7, No. 2, Summer 2006, p. 47.
  • 4Michael Green and Nicholas Szechenyi, Common Values: A New Agenda for U. S. -Japan for U. S. -Japan Relations, Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 7, No. 2, Summer 2006, p. 50.
  • 5Richard J. Samuels, "Japan's Goldilocks Strategy", p. 116.
  • 6Ezra F. Vogel, "Comments on Sino-Japanese Relations" . http: //se2. isn. ch/serviceengine/
  • 7Koji Murata, The U. S. -Japan Relationship: A Japanese View . httpz //sel. isn. ch/serviceengine/
  • 8Michael J. Green and Shinjiro Koizumi, "Abe Shows the Rights Stuff, Comparative Connection", a Quarterly E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations. http: //www. csis. org/media/csis/ pubs/0604qus _ japan. pdf
  • 9Richard J. Samuels, "Japan"s Goldilocks Strategy", pp. 111-127.
  • 10"Clinton Praise Strong U. S.-Japan Ties", The Daily Yomiuri, Tokyo, February 18, 2009.

共引文献15

同被引文献23

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部