期刊文献+

建筑物区分所有权关系中的自己地役权研究 被引量:4

Easement on One's Own Realty in the Relationship of Owners' Partitioned Ownership of Building Area
原文传递
导出
摘要 各国及地区日渐认可自己地役权在调整建筑物区分所有权关系中的重要作用,相对于房屋买卖契约、管理规约,自己地役权具有低成本、从属性、事前性、灵活性等独特价值。自己地役权可以由开发商在房屋销售前事先设定,也可由业主在购得房屋后设定。自己地役权应采登记生效主义,特定情形下,可基于默示行为设定。当自己地役权的内容构成对业主财产权的不合理限制、有违民法公平原则或者发生情势变更时,业主可以提出抗辩。为了实现对日渐复杂之建筑物区分所有权关系的有效调整,促进地役权法律资源效用最大化,有必要在《物权法》中增加自己地役权。 It's acknowledged that easement on one's own realty plays a more and more important part in adjusting re lationship in owners' partitioned ownership of building area. Compared to contract and convention, easement on one' s own realty is costless, subordinating, ex ante and flexible. It' s could be set both by developer and owner. Easement on one' s own realty should adopt registration validity doctrine, and in some circumstances, it can be set by implied behavior. Own er could plead not to enforce the easement, if it imposes unreasonable restrictions on owners' property, violates the princi ple of fairness or situation changed. In order to meet the objective needs of adjusting new legal relationships on new residenial pattern, and make full use of the legal resource of easement, it' s necessary to bring in easement on one' s own realty in China.
作者 于凤瑞
出处 《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第6期97-104,共8页 Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金 中国博士后科学基金(2014M550689)
关键词 建筑物区分所有权 自己地役权 设立主体 设立方式 抗辩事由 owners' partitioned ownership of building area easement on one' s own realty subject methods of estab-lishment demurring reasons
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Carol M. Rose, Servitudes, Research Handbook on the Economies of Property Law. Edited by Kenneth Ayotte and Henry E. Smith, Chehenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA : Edward, 2011 : 296 -325.
  • 2郑冠宇.地役权的现代化[J].烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2009,22(1):6-12. 被引量:15
  • 3Sanborn v. McLean, Supreme Court of Michigan 233 Mich. 227 ( 1925 ).
  • 4华建文,邹玉.《小区配套设施属于业主苏州36名业主争得车位》,《人民法院报》:2005年11月10日,第004版.
  • 5Sanborn v. McLean, Supreme Court of Michigan 233 Mich. 227 (1925).
  • 6Nahrstedt v. Lakeside Village Condominium Association Ass' n 878 P. 2d 1275, 1290(Cal. 1994).
  • 7Hidden Harbour Estates v. Basso, 393 So. 2d 637, 640 ( Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).
  • 8Hidden Harbour Estates v. Norman, 309 So. 2d 180, 181 - 182 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975).
  • 9Shelley v. Kraemer United States Supreme Court 334 U. S. 1 (1948).
  • 10Hill v. Community of Damien Molokai, Supreme Cout of New Mexico 121 N. 2. 353 (1996).

二级参考文献101

共引文献176

同被引文献27

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部