期刊文献+

宫颈冷刀锥切术及冰冻病理检查在宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)Ⅲ诊断治疗中的应用分析 被引量:11

The Analysis of Cold Knife Conization and Frozen Section Examination for Diagnosis and Treatment of the Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Ⅲ
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨宫颈冷刀锥切术及冰冻病理检查在宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)Ⅲ诊治中的价值。方法总结分析我院宫颈活检诊断为CINⅢ的患者60例,行宫颈冷刀锥切术及将标本术中冰冻病理检查,根据冰冻病检结果,决定仅行宫颈冷刀锥切术或筋膜外全子宫切除术或宫颈癌根治术。比较术前宫颈活检、术中冰冻病检、术后标本石蜡病理检查之间的符合率。结果术前宫颈活检与术中冰冻病检符合率为65%(39/60),术中冰冻病检与术后石蜡病理检查报告符合率为96.67%(58/60)。结论宫颈冷刀锥切联合术中冰冻病检是进一步诊断、指导治疗CINⅢ的快速、准确的方法。 Objective To study the role of cold knife conization( CKC) and frozen section examination( FSE) for diagno-sis and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III( CINIII) . Methods Collected 60 patients with a preoperative biopsy re-sult of stage CINIII were underwent CKC and FSE. By the result of FSE,to planned the operation such as cold knife conization or hysterectomy or operation for invasive cervical cancer. Compliance rate were comparaed with preoperative biopsy result and CKC, CKC and permanent section. Results The compliance rate between preoperative biopsy and cold knife conization was 65%. The compliance rate between cold knife conization and permanent section was 96. 67%. Conclution Cold knife conization and frozen section examination is a rapid and reliable method for diagnosis and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III farther.
作者 许剑利
出处 《四川医学》 CAS 2014年第10期1314-1316,共3页 Sichuan Medical Journal
关键词 CINⅢ 宫颈冷刀锥切术 冰冻病理检查 石蜡病理检查/ cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III cold knife conization frozen section examination permanent section
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献26

  • 1赵方辉,马俊飞,乔友林,戎寿德,李凌,章文华.人乳头状瘤病毒DNA载量与子宫颈病变的关系[J].中华流行病学杂志,2004,25(11):921-924. 被引量:48
  • 2薛耀华,陈子祥,郑宝文,张建明,朱庆义.广东妇女人乳头瘤病毒感染及宫颈细胞学的对照研究[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2005,27(5):283-285. 被引量:24
  • 3冯静,王朝华,王建六,魏丽惠.宫颈冷刀锥切治疗宫颈上皮内瘤样病变Ⅲ级的评价[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2006,22(10):754-755. 被引量:17
  • 4Rouzier R,Feyersisen E,Constancis E,et al.Frozen Section Examination of the Endocervical Margin of Cervical Conization Specimens[J].Gynecol Oncol,2003,90:305-9.
  • 5Matsuura Y, Kawageo T, Yoki N, et al. Early cervical neoplasia confirmed by conization: diagnostic accuracy of cytology, colposcopy and punch biopsy[J]. Acta Cytol,1996,40:241 - 246.
  • 6Srisomboon J, Tangchaitrong CA, Bhusawang Y, et al.Evaluation of colposcopic accuracy in diagnosis of cervical neoplasia[J]. J Med Assoc Thai, 1996, 79:423 -428.
  • 7Chang DY, Cheng WF, Tomg PL, et al. Prediction of residual neoplasia based on histopathology and margin status of coninazation specimens[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 1996, 63:53 - 56.
  • 8Cirisano-FD. Management of pre-invasive disease of the cervix[J]. Semin Surg Oncol, 1999, 16:222 - 227.
  • 9Brun JL, Youbi A, Hocke C. Complications, after-effects of conizations and follow-up of patients after treatment: assessment of 3 conization methods[J]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod(Paris), 2002, 31 : 558 - 564.
  • 10Giacalone PL, Laffargue F, Aligier N, et al. Randomized study comparing two techniques of conization: cold knife versus loop excision[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 1999, 75:356 - 360.

共引文献565

同被引文献98

引证文献11

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部