期刊文献+

以学生为中心的教育质量评价理念及其反思 被引量:5

Student-centered Concept of Education Quality Evaluation and the Reflection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,我国一些学者在以学生为本的学习评价方面进行了有益的理论研究与实践探索。许多高校还与美国高校合作,开展了大规模的国际比较学生评价研究。对国内外在教育质量保障制度建设与以学生为本评价理念关系研究、高等教育质量评价模式转变、评价指标体系建构与大学生学习科学研究的成果进行分析可知,我们在学习西方经验的同时,应该关注我国的"特殊指标",其中包括将学生学习评价与体制、制度建设评价同步进行,教育公平指标与效率指标、文化创新与传承指标同时考虑,不同类型的高校要区别对待等。 In recent years, some scholars in china have been doing some useful theoretical research and practical exploration in student-centered learning evaluation. Many universities have also worked with American universities and launched a large-scale international comparative evaluation of students. In the quality assurance system for domestic and foreign construction and evaluation of student-centered concept of the relationship be-tween higher education quality evaluation paradigm shift, the results of the evaluation index system construction and college students to learn science conducted analysis shows that the education of our experience at the same time learn from the West, it should be Watch our “special targets”, which includes the evaluation of student learning and institutional building of systems evaluation carried out simultaneously, fairness and efficiency indi-cators index education, culture and heritage of innovation indicators taking into account the different types of colleges and universities should be treated differently and so on.
机构地区 南京大学
出处 《阅江学刊》 2014年第5期24-30,共7页 Yuejiang Academic Journal
关键词 以学生为中心 学习科学 高等教育评价 中国问题 Student-centered learning science higher education evaluation Chinese problem
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

二级参考文献186

共引文献898

同被引文献60

  • 1满晶,马欣川.罗杰斯“以学生为中心”的教学思想述评[J].外国教育研究,1993(3):1-5. 被引量:48
  • 2周廷勇,周作宇.关于大学师生交往状况的实证研究[J].高等教育研究,2005,26(3):79-84. 被引量:38
  • 3约翰·亨利·纽曼.大学的理想(节本)[M].杭州:浙江教育出版社,2001:2.
  • 4Alexander Astin. Achieving Educational Excellence: A Critical Assessment of Priorities and Practice in Higher Education [M]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1985. 135-136.
  • 5Vincent Tinto. Leaving College: Re- thinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition (2nd ed.) [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993. 114.
  • 6Ernest Pascarella, Patrick Terenzini. How College Affects Students, Volume2, A Third Decade of Research [M ]. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2005.57.
  • 7Ernest PascareUa. How Effective Are the NSSE Benchmarks in Predicting Important Educational Outcomes? [J ]. Change, January/ February, 2010. 16-22.
  • 8Shouping Hu, Alexander C. McCormick. An Engagement-Based Student Typology and Its Relationship to College Outcomes [J]. Research in Higher Education, 2012, 53. 739.
  • 9Stephen Raudenbush, Anthony Bryk. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods (Second Edition) [M]. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication, 2002. 5-13.
  • 10Jennifer A. Fredricks, Phyllis C. Blumenfeld and Alison H. Paris. School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence [J ]. Review of Educational Research, 2004, 74 (1): 60.

引证文献5

二级引证文献105

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部