期刊文献+

区域服务贸易协定、制度因素与服务贸易促进体系研究——基于49国之间双边服务贸易流量面板数据的实证分析 被引量:40

Study on Regional Trade in Service Agreement, Institutional Factors and Promotion System of Service Trade: An Empirical Analysis Based on Panel Data of Bilateral Service Trade Flow between 49 countries
原文传递
导出
摘要 WTO多哈回合谈判一再停滞,各种双边和区域自由贸易谈判风起云涌,这时大力发展服务贸易、优化服务贸易出口的区位结构、调整与服务贸易相关的制度安排就成为当务之急。本文从制度角度出发,结合区域服务贸易协定的法律视角,以49国之间共1526个经济体对2000-2011年的面板数据为样本,采用豪斯曼-泰勒估计方法对这些国家之间的双边服务贸易流量决定因素进行了实证研究。结果表明:(1)区域服务贸易协定可以直接促进双边服务贸易发展,其提升幅度大致为5.77%-9.77%;(2)进口国的制度质量可以有效促进双边服务贸易的发展,而两国间的制度距离将对双边服务贸易造成阻碍;(3)区域服务贸易协定还具有间接的贸易促进作用,它不仅可以强化制度质量对于双边服务贸易流量的促进作用,还能反向调节制度距离对于双边服务贸易的负面影响程度。 As the WTO Doha Round Negotiation stalled again, almost all the countries are seeking the cooperation of RTAs. It has been top priorities to develop the service trade, optimize the regional structure of service trade export and adjust the institutional arrangements related to service trade. From the institutional point of view and the legal perspective of RTAs of service, this paper conducts an empirical research on the panel data of 1526 pairs of economies among49 countries from 2000-2011 with Hausman-Taylor estimation method. The results show that the RTAs of service can significantly promote the bilateral service trade among the sample countries by about 3.479%-7.659%. Besides, the institutional quality of the import country could effectively promote the bilateral service trade, but the institutional distance could hinder bilateral service trade. Moreover,the RTAs of service also have indirect trade promotion function. They could not only strengthen the positive effect of institutional quality on bilateral service trade, but also reversely regulate the negative effect of institutional distance on bilateral service trade.
作者 陈丽丽 龚静
出处 《国际贸易问题》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第11期132-143,共12页 Journal of International Trade
基金 西南财经大学"中央高校基本科研业务费(JBK120403)" 西南财经大学2014年度中央高校基本科研业务费博士生课题项"运输时间对我国省际对外贸易发展的影响研究(JBK1407166)"的资助成果
关键词 区域服务贸易协定 制度质量 制度距离 促进体系 Regional trade in service agreements Institutional quality Institu-tional distance Promotion system
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献126

  • 1伊文成.中日经济关系的现状与前景[J].日本研究,1992(4):7-9. 被引量:1
  • 2杨栋梁.中日经贸合作的新动态及其发展趋势[J].现代日本经济,2007,26(1):50-53. 被引量:6
  • 3陶一桃.CEPA的制度绩效与“邻里效应”分析[J].广东社会科学,2007(2):104-109. 被引量:1
  • 4刘顺忠,景丽芳,荣丽敏.知识密集型服务业创新政策研究[J].科学学研究,2007,25(4):793-797. 被引量:19
  • 5L.E戴维斯,D.C.诺思.制度创新的理论:描述、类推与说明.载R.科斯等.财产权利与制度变迁—产权学派与新制度学派译文集.上海三联书店,上海人民出版社,1994.
  • 6Baldwin, R., S. Evenett and P. Low, Beyond Tariffs: Multilateralizing Non-tariff RTA Commitments, in Baldwin, R. and P. Low (eds.), Multilaeralizing Regionalism. Challenges for the Global Trading System, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009, pp. 79-141.
  • 7Baptista Neto, J.A. , United States Preferential Trade Agreements in Services: How far Beyond the NAFTA? Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the Masters of International Law and Economics (MILE), World Trade Institute, University of Bern, Bern, 30 October, 2009.
  • 8Beviglia-Zampetti, A. and P. Sauve, Rules of Origin for Services: Economic and Legal Consideration, in Cadot, O. A. Estevadeordal, A. Suwa-Eisenmann and T. Verdier ( eds. ), The Origin of Goods: Rules of Origin in Regional Trade Agreements, Londonn : Oxford University Press and CEPR, 2006, pp. 114-145.
  • 9Carsten Fink, PTAs in Services: Friends or Foes of the Multilateral Trading System? in Marchetti, J. and M. Roy( eds. ), Opening Markets for Trade in Services: Countries and Sectors in Bilateral and WTO Negotiations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 200?,pp. 113-147.
  • 10Carsten Fink, Marion Jansen Services Provisions in Rregional Trade Agreements: Stumbling or Building Blocks for Multilateral Liberalization", Paper presented at the Conference on Multilateralising Regionalism Sponsored and organized by WTO HEI Co organized by the Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) ,10-12 September,2007, Geneva, Switzerland.

共引文献364

同被引文献335

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部