期刊文献+

创伤性休克患者早期镇痛干预的对比研究 被引量:2

Comparative Study on Early Analgesic Intervention of Patients with Traumatic Shock
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过对比研究,探讨镇痛治疗在创伤性休克早期复苏中的作用。方法收集我院急诊科40例中度创伤性休克患者,根据休克指数分级,分为实验及对照两组。实验组患者除进行一般抗休克治疗外,早期给予芬太尼微量泵镇痛治疗,对照组不予镇痛治疗,比较两组患者在疼痛程度、血压、毛细血管充盈时间、尿量、呼吸、补液量等方面的改善情况。结果 VRS均值、烦躁情况、心率、呼吸在30,60,90min时均有明显差异(P<0.05);休克指数、血压、毛细血管充盈时间在30min时无明显差异,但在60及90min时存在明显差异。氧饱和度两组患者在各时间段均未见明显差异。结论镇痛治疗在创伤性休克早期复苏中有重要作用,应完善创伤性休克患者的早期镇痛治疗,并初步探讨镇痛治疗的方法及方式。 Objective To study the effect of analgesic therapy in the treatment of traumatic shock resuscitation through compara -tive study.Methods Forty cases of traumatic shock patients in the emergency department of our hospital was collected and divided into ex -perimental and control groups according to the shock index classification .The patients in the experimental group was treated with trace fenta-nyl analgesia in addition to the general anti-shock treatment ,and the control group did not improve the situation of analgesic therapy .Then, two groups of patients were compared in pain degree ,blood pressure,capillary filling time,urine,breath,fluid volume and so on.Results There were significant differences in mean of VRS ,irritability,heart rate,respiration in the three stages of 30,60 and 90 minutes.SI,BP,cap-illary filling time in 30 minutes were not significantly different ,but there were obvious differences in 60 and 90 minutes.Oxygen saturation of patients in the two groups had no significant difference in all periods of time .Conclusion The analgesic treatment worked as an important role in the early stage of traumatic shock resuscitation ,it should be improved in the future ,and explored further in the method .
作者 王磊
出处 《潍坊医学院学报》 2014年第5期375-376,共2页 Acta Academiae Medicinae Weifang
关键词 创伤性休克 镇痛治疗 休克指数 Traumatic shock Analgesia Shock index
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献36

  • 1Becker N. Pain epidemiology and health related quality of life in chronic non-malignant pain patients referred to a Danish multidisciplinary pain center. Pain, 1997,7:393-400.
  • 2Portenoy RK. Chronic opioid therapy in non-malignant pain. J Pain Symptom Manage ,1990,5:S46-S62.
  • 3Portenoy RK. Opioid therapy for chronic non-malignant pain: a review of critical issues. J Pain Symptom Manage, 1996,11:203-217.
  • 4Dellemijn PLI, Vanneste JAL. Randomized double-blind active-placebocontrolled crossover trial of intravenous fentanyl in neuropathic pain.Lancet, 1997,349:753-758.
  • 5Arkinstall W, Sandier A, Goughnour B, et al. Efficacy of controlledrelease codeine in chronic nonmalisnant pain: a randomized, placebocontrolled clinical trial. Pain , 1995,62 : 169-178.
  • 6Jamixon RN. Comprehensive pretreatment and outcome assessment for chromic opioid therapy in non-cancer pain. J Pain Symptom Manage,1996,11:231-241.
  • 7Richant P, Sonja C, Meredith E. Guidelines for the clinical use of transdermal fentanyl. Anti-Cancer Drugs, 1995,6 (Suppl 3):50-53.
  • 8Richard BR, Antona J. Transdermal fentanyl: an updated review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in chronic cancer pain control. Drugs , 2001,61:2289-2307.
  • 9Wendy J, Paul B. Transdermal fentanyl: an updated review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in pain control. Drugs,1997,53 : 109-138.
  • 10Allan L, Hays H, Jensen NH, et al. Randomized croesover trial of transdermal fentanyl and sustained released oral morphine for treating chronic non-cancer pain.BMJ,2001,322:1154-1158.

共引文献144

同被引文献42

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部