1Rao H D, Currir B L, Albert T J.et al. Degenerative cervical spondyln-is: clinical syndromes, pathngenesis , and management [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2007, 89 (6) : 1360 - 1378.
2Kadanka Z, Bf'dnarlk J, Novotny O. 1'1 al. Cervical spondyloti? llIyt-'lopathy: conservative versus surgical treatment arkr 10 years [J] .Fur Spint.J. 20 II . 20 ( 9) : 1533 - 1538.
3Shedid D, BPl1Z<·1 E C. Decision rn: king process: Problem based decision making [J]. Neurosurgery , 2007, 60 (II Suppl I ) : SI66 - S169.
4Komotar H J, MO(TO J, Kaiser M (;. Surgical management of cervical myelopathy: Indications and I(>('hniques for laminectomy and fusion [J]. Spine J, 2006, 6( 6 Suppl ) : 252S - 267S.
5Traynelis V C, Arnold PM, Fournev D H. ct al , Alternative pro· cr-dures for the treatment of cervical spondvlotic myelopathy: arthroplasty, oblique eorpeotomv , skip laminectomy: evaluation of comparative effectiveness and safety [J]. Spine , 2013, 38(22 Suppl I) : S210 - 231.
6l.iu T, Xu W, Cheng 1', et al. Anterior versus postr-rior surgery for multilevel cervical myelopathy, which one is better? A systematic review [J]. Eur Spine J, 20 II , 20 (2) : 224 - 235.
7Rishi D 5, Nandoe T, Ronald H M, et al. Long tenn outcome after anterior cervical discectomy without fusion [J]. Eur Spine J, 2007, 16(9): 1411 -1416.
8Muthukumar N. Surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy [J]. Neurol India, 2012, 60(2): 201 -209.
9Burkhardt J K, Mannion A F, Marbacher 5, et al. A comparative effectiveness study of patient-rated and radiographic outcome after 2 types of decompression with fusion for spondylotic myelopathy: anterior cervical discectomy versus corpectomy [J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2013, 35(1) : E4.
10Konig 5 A, Spetzger U. Surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy indications for anterior, posterior or combined procedures for decompression and stabilization [J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2014,156(2): 253 -258.
