期刊文献+

腹腔镜胆道探查取石术应用体会 被引量:3

Application experiences of laparoscopic biliary duct exploration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜胆道探查取石术的可行性。方法回顾性分析38例腹腔镜胆道探查取石病人的临床资料,对手术适应证、手术方式及并发症的预防进行总结。结果38例病人中,胆总管结石36例,胆总管扩张未见结石2例。同时合并胆囊结石34例,合并有肝内胆管结石2例,合并肝囊肿2例。术前全部病人均行B超和MRCP检查。37例(97.4%)完成腹腔镜胆道探查取石术,1例因致密粘连中转开腹手术,36例同时行腹腔镜胆囊切除,2例同时行肝囊肿开窗引流术。14例行胆总管一期缝合,24例行胆总管T管引流。手术时间为1~4h,平均1.5h。住院时间3~12d,平均5.5d。术后发生胆瘘2例,胆总管下端残余结石1例,胸腔积液1例。结论腹腔镜胆道探查术安全、微创、美观,可明显缩短住院时间,是一种可选择的治疗方法。 Objective To explore the feasibility of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct lithotomy. Methods Retrospective analyses of clinical data were preformed for 38 cases of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for stone. And their surgical indications, approaches and complications were summarized. Results Among them, there were biliary calculus of common bile duct (n = 36) and bile duct dilatation without stone (n = 2). The concurrent conditions included gallbladder stone (n = 34), intrahepatic bile duct stone (n = 2) and hepatic cyst (n = 2). Before operation, all patients received type B ultrasound and MRCP examination. Among 37 patients (97. 4% ) with laparoscopic biliary duct exploration, there were laparotomy due to dense adhesion (n = 1), laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 36) and hepatic cyst open drainage (n = 2). Primary suture of common bile duct (n = 14) and common bile duct T tube drainage (n = 24) were performed. The average operative dura- tion was 1.5 (1-4) hours. And the average hospital stay was 5.5(3-12) days. The postoperative complications included biliary fistula (n = 2), bile duct residual stone (n = 1) and pleural effusion (n = 1). Conclusions Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is safe and mini-invasive. And it can significantly shorten the time of hospitalization.
机构地区 云南临沧
出处 《腹部外科》 2014年第5期359-361,共3页 Journal of Abdominal Surgery
基金 云南省中青年学科带头人后备人才培养基金资助(No.2006PY01-63)
关键词 胆总管结石 腹腔镜 外科 Common bile duct calculi Laparoscopic Surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献88

共引文献198

同被引文献31

  • 1戴德坚,陆才德,周新华,孟化.腹腔镜胆道探查临床应用分析(附340例报告)[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2004,10(2):108-110. 被引量:17
  • 2蔡秀军.腹腔镜在腹部外科应用的现状及发展方向[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(3):145-148. 被引量:67
  • 3Grubnic VV, Tkachenko AI, Ilyashenko W, et al. Laparoscopie commom bile duct exploration versus open surgery: comparative prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc, 2012,26 : 2165-2171.
  • 4Yamazaki M, Yasuda H, Tsukamoto S, et al. Primary closure of the common bile duct in open laparotomy for common bile duct stones. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 2006,13 :398-402.
  • 5Eigeidie AA, Eishobary MM, Naeem YM. Laparoscopic explora- tion versus Intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones: a prospective randomizedtrial. Dig Surg, 2011, 28 : 424-431.
  • 6Cusehieri A, Lezoehe E, Morino M, et al. E. A. E. S. multieenter prospective randomized trial comparing two stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi. Surg Endosc, 1999,13 : 952-957.
  • 7Miura F,Takada T,Kawarada Y, et al. Flowcharts for the diag- nosisand treatment of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 2007,14: 27-34.
  • 8Decker G, Boric F, Millat B, et al. One hundred Laparoscopic choledochotomies with primary closure of common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc, 2003,17 : 12-18.
  • 9Arya N, Nelles SE, Haher GB, et al. Eleetrohydraulic lithotripry in 111 patients..a safe and effective therapy for difficult bile duct stone. Am J Gastroenterol, 2004,99: 2330-2334.
  • 10戴晓江,印慨,陈丹磊,柯重伟,李际辉,郑成竹.腹腔镜下胆总管探查取石术91例[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2008,13(2):139-140. 被引量:26

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部