期刊文献+

TPP投资协定中冲突条款的适用困境与突破 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 TPP投资协定中的冲突条款据其功能可以划分为实体性冲突条款和程序性冲突条款,但在实际解决冲突时却可能产生适用困境,包括因条款的模糊表述而产生的实体困境,以及有关国际投资仲裁平行诉讼的程序困境。对此,仅从条约解释的角度来看,可通过改进条约解释方法和敦促权威解释出台,来化解TPP投资协定中冲突条款的适用困境。
作者 陈琛
出处 《广西社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第11期88-92,共5页 Social Sciences in Guangxi
基金 国家社会科学基金青年项目(14CFX052) 江苏省教育厅普通高校研究生科研创新计划项目(CXLX13_007) 安徽省哲学社会科学规划青年项目(AHSKQ2014D01)
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1International Law Commission,MarttiKoskenniemi.Fragmentation of International Law:Dif f iculties Arising from the Diversif ication andEx pansion of Inter nationa l Law[R].UN Genera lAssembly Document,2007:268;277-280.
  • 2Dinah Shelton.Reconcilable Dif ferences-The Inter pret at ion of Mu lt i l i ng ua l Treat ies[J].Ha s t i n g s I nt e r n a t ion a l a nd Comp a r a t i ve L awReview,1997,(20):611.
  • 3Joost Pauwely n. Con f l ict s of Nor ms i nP u b l i c I n t e r n a t i o n a l L aw: How WTO L awRelates to Other Rules of International Law[M].Cambridge:Cambridge Universit y Press,2003:334-336.
  • 4刘笋.国际投资与环境保护的法律冲突与协调——以晚近区域性投资条约及相关案例为研究对象[J].现代法学,2006,28(6):34-44. 被引量:25
  • 5Stephen M.Schwebel.Justice in InternationalLaw[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2011:152-160.
  • 6Sha ne Spel l isc y.The Prol i ferat ion ofInternational Tribunals:A Chink in the Armor[J].Columbia Jour na l of Transnationa l Law,20 01,(41):143-149.
  • 7廖诗评.国际条约中的冲突条款评析[J].政治与法律,2007(3):95-100. 被引量:8
  • 8Ana M. Lopez-Rodriguez. Towards aEuropean Civil Code without a Common EuropeanLegal Culture- The Link between Law, Languageand Culture[J].Brooklyn Journal of InternationalLaw,2004,(29):1206-1213.
  • 9A lex Glashausser. What We Must NeverForget When It is a Treaty We are Expounding[J].Un iver sit y of Ci nc i n n at i L aw Rev iew,2 0 05,(23):1263-1267.
  • 10S o u t h e r n P a c i f i c P r o p e r t i e s(M i d d l eEast) Limited v. Arab Republic of Egypt,ICSIDCase No. ABR/84 /3,Decision on Jurisdiction,N o v. 2 7,1 9 8 5,1 6 Y. B C o m . A r b .1 9(1 9 9 1)(exerpts); 3 ICSID Rep. 112(1995).

二级参考文献34

  • 1[英]安托尼·奥斯特:《现代条约法与实践》,江国青译,中国人民大学出版社2005年版,第141页,第143-144页,第147页
  • 2秦天宝.我国和平发展与环境保护的同际法律问题及我国对策—以气候变化问题为例[A].武汉大学国际法研究所“中国和平崛起与国际法研讨会”论文集[C].2005.196—197.
  • 3Francisco S. Nogales,Framework, Chapter 11 Investment The NAFTA EnvironmentalProvisions and the Environment[ J ]. 8 Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law 2002, 110.
  • 4David A Gantz, Potential Conflicts between Investors Rights and Environmental Regulation under NAFTA's Chapter 11[J]. 33 George Washington International Law Review, 2001,681 - 683.
  • 5NAAEC art. 1(c), art. 1, art. 3, 32 1. 1. M[M],1993, 1482.
  • 6The Council of Canadians, NAFTA's Big Brother: The Free Trade Area of the Americas and the Threat of NAFTA - style Investor-State'Rules March 20, 2001, p. 2.
  • 7J. Martin Wagner, International Investment, Expropriation and Environmental Protection [ J ]. 29 Gohten Gate University Law Review, 1999, 534 - 535.
  • 8Christopher, Deciphering "Sustainable Development"[J], 69 Chicago-Kent Law Review, 1994, 978-979.
  • 9Jonathan Fried, Globalization and International Law- Some Thoughts for Citizens and States [ J ]. 23 Queen's LawJournal, 1997, 259, 274.
  • 10Howard Mann, NAFAT and the Environment: Lessons for the Future[J]. 13 Tulane Environmental Law Journal,2000, 408.

共引文献34

同被引文献21

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部