检察机关参与环境公益诉讼的实证分析

An Empirical Analysis on Public Prosecutors' Roles Participating in Environmental Public Interest Litigation

当前,检察机关参与环境公益诉讼仍处于"摸着石头过河"阶段。检察机关参与环境公益诉讼具体程序性规范缺失,具体操作过程中亦缺乏一整套可供借鉴的经验。环境纠纷中,拥有污染企业众多信息以及其他违法证据的环保机关需要熟知诉讼程序与技巧的检察机关的支持,而检察机关亦离不开环保机关为其提供必要的证据与线索。两者应通力协作,以司法的"钢牙",为环境执法提供强有力的后盾。通过实证考察检察机关参与环境公益诉讼的主要特征与现实掣肘,试图寻求契合我国实情的检察机关参与环境公益诉讼之路,从而助推生态文明建设司法机制的完善。

At present,the public prosecutors’ roles when participating public interest litigation are stillin the “trial and error” phase on the environmental public interest litigation. When procuratorates participate inenvironmental public interest litigation,there are no specific procedural norms and a set of operating experiencefor reference. In environmental disputes,environmental authorities with a lot of information of pollutingenterprises and other illegal evidences need the support of prosecuting organ which is familiar with the techniquesof the proceedings and skills,the prosecuting organ also needs the environmental authorities to provide thenecessary evidence. Environmental authorities and public prosecutors should collaborate and use the “steelteeth” of justice to provide a strong support for environmental enforcement. Through the empirical investigation ofthe main characteristics and realistic constraints of prosecuting organ in environmental public interest litigation.This article attemptes to find a way which fits our county’s reality for procuratorial organ involved in theenvironmental public interest litigation,thus boost the construction and improvement of ecological civilization’sjustice mechanism.