期刊文献+

下颌前导矫形与单纯拔牙矫治对骨性Ⅱ类错畸形的疗效评价 被引量:4

Efficacy evaluation of fixed Twin-block appliance and tooth extraction in skeletal Class Ⅱ malocclusion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:通过X线头影测量分析,评价前导矫形联合固定矫治器矫治和单纯拔牙固定矫治对生长发育期安氏Ⅱ类骨性错畸形的临床疗效。方法:选取31例生长发育期安氏Ⅱ类错畸形伴下颌后缩的病例。其中,18例采用Ⅰ期固定式Twin-block矫治器联合Ⅱ期固定矫治;13例采用传统的单纯拔牙后使用直丝弓矫治器进行治疗。在治疗前、Twin-block矫治完成后以及全部固定矫治结束后拍摄X线头颅侧位片,利用Pancherz测量分析法进行分析,使用SPSS15.0软件包分别比较前导矫形组、单纯拔牙组治疗前后的组内差异以及2组的组间差异。结果:前导矫形组下颌骨长度增加并向前移动,上切牙相对于上颌骨的位置向后方移动,下切牙、下颌第一恒磨牙相对于下颌骨的位置均向前方移动,覆盖减小(P<0.05)。单纯拔牙组上、下颌骨的位置、髁突位置及下颌骨的长度治疗前后均无显著变化。在前牙覆盖的纠正中,前导组牙性因素占39.5%,骨性因素占60.5%,拔牙组牙性因素占86.9%,骨性因素占13.1%;在磨牙关系的纠正中,前导组牙性因素占44.9%,骨性因素占55.1%,拔牙组牙性因素占90.3%,骨性因素占9.7%。结论:前导矫形联合固定矫治与单纯拔牙固定矫治相比,在治疗生长发育期骨性Ⅱ类下颌后缩的患者中,疗效近似,但能更显著地改善患者的骨性侧貌。 PURPOSE: To evaluate the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-Block combined with straight wire appliances and tooth extraction in the treatment of skeletal Class Ⅱ malocclusion with mandibular retrognathia in growing individuals. METHODS: The sample comprised 31 growing individuals with skeletal Class Ⅱ and mandibular retrognathia, divided into 2 groups. One group (18 patients) was treated with fixed Twin-block combined with fixed appliance; the other group (13 patients) was only treated with fixed appliance after tooth extraction. Lateral cephalograms pretreatment and posttreatment were taken before and after Twin-block treatment and after all fixed appliance treatment. Pancherz's cephalometrie measurements were analyzed statistically. Intragroup and intergroup changes of the two groups were evaluated by test using SPSS 15.0 software package. RESULTS: According to Pancherz's analysis, mandibular length increased, point Pg, mandibular incisors and first molars moved forward, maxillary incisors moved backward, overjet decreased (P〈0.05) after treatment with Twin-block and fixed appliance. Within the rectification of anterior overjet, proportion of dentofacial factor was 39.5%, skeletal factor was 60.5%. Within the rectification of posterior relationship, proportion of dentofacial factor was 44.9%, skeletal factor was 55.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Twin-block combined with fixed appliance treatment can efficiently promotemandibular growth, restrict forward growth of maxilla to some extent, correct incisor and molar relationship and improve skeletal profile in growing skeletal Class Ⅱ individuals with mandibular retrognathia.
出处 《上海口腔医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第5期597-600,共4页 Shanghai Journal of Stomatology
关键词 骨性Ⅱ类错[牙合]畸形 TWIN-BLOCK矫治器 Pancherz分析 双期矫治 Skeletal Class Ⅱ malocclusion Twin-block appliance Pancherz analysis Two-phase treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Kelly JE, Harvey CR. An assessment of the occlusion of the teeth of youths 12-17 years [J]. Vital Health Stat,1977, (162): 1-65.
  • 2McLain JB, Proffitt WR. Oral health status in the United States: prevalence of malocclusion[J]. J Dent Educ,1985,49(6): 386-397.
  • 3Proffit WR, Fields HW Jr, Moray LJ. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANES Ⅱ I survey [J]. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, 1998, 13(2): 97-106.
  • 4Moyers RE, Riolo ML, Guire KE, et al. Differential diagnosis of Class Ⅱ malocclusions. Part 1. Facial types associated with Class Ⅱ malocclusions [J]. Am J Orthod, 1980, 78(5): 477-494.
  • 5McNamara JA Jr. Components of class Ⅱ malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age [J].Angle Orthod,1981,51(3):177-202.
  • 6邹冰爽,曾祥龙,曾应魁.安氏Ⅱ1类错骀颅面类型的研究[J].中华口腔医学杂志,1999,47(1):35.
  • 7Bjork A, Skieller V. Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years[J]. Eur J Orthod,1983,5(1):1-46.
  • 8Bjork A. The relationship of the jaws to the cranium [C]// Lundstrom A. Introduction to orthodontics [M]. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company, 1960: 104-140.
  • 9Springate SD, Jones AG. The validity of two methods of mandibular superimposition: a comparison with tantalum implants[J]. Am J Orthod, 1998, 113(3): 263-270.
  • 10Jena AK, Duggal R, Parkash H. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class Ⅱ malocclusion: a comparative study [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2006, 130(5): 594-602.

二级参考文献9

  • 1Arvystas MG. Nonextraction treatment of severe ClassⅡ Division 2 malocclusion. Part2 [J]. AM J Orthod Dentofac Orthop,1991,99:74-84.
  • 2Pancherz H, Zieber K, Hoyer B. Cephalometric characteristics of ClassⅡ Division 1 and ClassⅡ Division 2 malocclusion: a comparative study in children [J]. Angle orthodontist, 1997,67:111-120.
  • 3Obijou C, Pancherz H. Herbst appliance treatment of ClassⅡDivision2 malocclusion [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 1997,112:287-291.
  • 4Basdra EK, Kiokpasoglou M, Stellzig A. The ClassⅡ Division 2 craniofacial type is associated with numerous congenital tooth anomalies [J]. European Journal of Orthodontics, 2000,22:529-535.
  • 5Peck S, Peck L, Kataia M. ClassⅡDivision2 Malocclusion. A heritable pattern of small teeth in well-developed jaws [J]. Angle Orthodontist, 1998,68(1):9-20.
  • 6Arvystas MG. Nonextraction treatment of severe ClassⅡ Division 2 malocclusion. Part1 [J]. AM J Orthod Dentofac Orthop,1990,97:510-521.
  • 7Byrant RM, Sadowsky PL, Hazelrig JB. Variability in three morphologic features of the permanent maxillary central incisor [J]. AM J Orthod, 1984,86:25-32.
  • 8Cozza P, De Toffol L, Iacopini L. An Analysis of the Corrective Contribution in Activator Treatment [J].The Angle Orthodontist,2004(6):739-746.
  • 9陈国新,袁文钧,贺红,华先明,沈真祥.下颌前伸矫治器治疗AngleⅡ类错[J].口腔医学纵横,2001,17(2):135-136. 被引量:4

共引文献6

同被引文献37

  • 1Moyers RE, Riolo ML, Guire KE, et al. Differential diagnosis of Class 11 malocclusions. Part 1. Facial types associated with Class 1I malocclusions [J]. Am J Orthod, 1980, 78(5): 477-494.
  • 2McNamara JA Jr. Compennents of Class 11 malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age [J]. Angle Orthod, 1981, 51(3): 177- 202.
  • 3Vargervik K, Halovold EP. Response to activator treatment in Class 1I malocclusion [J]. Am J Orthod, 1985, 88(3): 242-251.
  • 4Teuseher U, Stoekli P. Combined activator-headgear olthopedics[C]// Orthodonties: current principles and techniques [M]. St.Louis: C. V. Mosby Co.,1985: 405-480.
  • 5Gaumond G. Hyperpropulsor activator [J]. J Clin Orthod,1986,20(6): 405-411.
  • 6Darendeliler MA, Joho JP. Magnetic activator device 1I (MAD II ) for correction of Class U, division 1 malocclusions [J]. Am J Orthod, 1993, 103(3): 223-239.
  • 7McNamara JA Jr, Huge SA. The Frinkel appliance(FR-2): model preparation and appliance construction [J]. Am J Orthod, 1981, 80(5): 478-495.
  • 8Owen AH 3rd. Morphologic changes in the sagittal dimension using the Frankel appliance [J]. Am J Orthod,1981, 80(6): 573- 603.
  • 9McNamara JA Jr. JCO Interviews Dr. Jmaes A. McNamara Jr. on the Frankel appliance. Part 1-Biological basis and appliance design [J]. J Clin Orthod, 1982, 16(5): 320-337.
  • 10McNamara JA Jr. JCO/interviews Dr. Jmaes A. McNamara, Jr. on the Frankel appliance. Part 2-Clinical management [J]. J Clin Orthod, 1982, 16(6): 390-407.

引证文献4

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部