期刊文献+

应用两种定义标准判断胰头部导管腺癌切除标本R1切缘的临床研究 被引量:1

A clinical study about applying different R1 criteria to evaluate pancreatic head ductal adenocarcinoma specimens
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨用统一的方法处理标本后分别采用国际抗癌联盟和英国皇家病理学会两种R1切缘定义标准判断胰头癌切除标本R1切缘的发生情况.方法 前瞻性收集2010年11月至2013年10月在北京大学第三医院普通外科因胰头周围肿瘤行胰头十二指肠切除术患者的临床和病理资料,获得由病理证实为胰腺导管腺癌的患者70例.采用统一的方法对胰头十二指肠切除术标本进行取材,除胰颈断端、胆总管断端、胃体空肠断端外,用不同颜色标记胰头前表面、肠系膜上静脉沟切缘、肠系膜上动脉切缘与胰头后表面.每3个月通过门诊复查或电话对患者进行随访.结果 70例胰头部胰腺导管腺癌患者中,高、中、低分化分别为3、30、37例,pT1、pT2、pT3期患者分别有7、15、48例;40例(57.1%)有区域性淋巴结转移(pN1),16例(22.9%)有腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移;13例(18.6%)同时行肠系膜上静脉或门静脉部分切除吻合术.采用UICC标准时,26例(26/70,37.1%)为R1切缘,总共33个切缘为R1切缘,肠系膜上静脉沟切缘和肠系膜上动脉切缘均占全部R1切缘的39.4%(13/33).采用英国皇家病理学家学会标准时,39例(39/70,55.7%)为R1切缘,总共51个切缘为R1切缘,肠系膜上静脉沟切缘和肠系膜上动脉切缘分别占全部R1切缘的35.3%(18/51)和37.3%(19/51).随访至2014年4月,中位随访时间为18个月(6~ 42个月).结论 采用统一的方法处理胰头部胰腺导管腺癌切除标本时,环周切缘有较高的R1切缘发生率,并且R1切缘发生率与不同的R1切缘定义有关.肠系膜上血管切缘是R1发生率最主要的部位. Objective To analyze the R1 rate of the pancreatic head carcinoma resection specimens which deh with a unified protocol by two different R1 criteria.Methods Between November 2011 and October 2013,a unified pathological protocol was prospectively used to handle 70 consecutive pancreatioduodenectomy specimens for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Apart from the pancreatic transection margin,the bile duct and stomach/jejunum margins,different colors were used to stain the anterior surface,the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) groove margin,the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) margin,and the posterior surface.Axial slicing technique was used to dissect the pancreatioduodenectomy specimens.Results Among the 70 patients,3,30 and 37 patients were classified as well,moderately and poorly differentiated respectively; 7,15 and 48 patients were classified as pT1,pT2 and pT3 respectively.Forty patients (57.1%) had metastases in regional lymph nodes (pN1),and 16 patients (22.9%) had metastases in para-aortic nodes.Resection of the portal vein and/or the superior mesenteric vein was performed in 13 patients (18.6%).When applying the UICC criteria,26 cancer resections were classified R1(37.1%),33 margins were turned out to be R1.The SMV groove margin and SMA margin were infiltrated in 13 specimens(13/33,39.4%) respectively.When applying the Royal College of Pathologist's criteria,39 cancer resections were classified R1 (55.7%),51 margins were turned out to be R1.The SMV groove margin and SMA margin were infiltrated in 18(18/51,35.3%) and 19(19/51,37.3%) specimen respectively.Until April 2014,the median follow-up was 18 (range 6-42) months.Conclusions Applying the unified protocol for pancreatic head ductal adenocarcinoma specimens results in an significant R1 rate of the resection margins,and the R1 rate is related to the R1 criterion.The SMV groove margin and SMA margin are the two most frequent sites of R1.
出处 《中华外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第11期834-838,共5页 Chinese Journal of Surgery
关键词 胰腺肿瘤 胰头十二指肠切除术 切缘 Pancreatic neoplasms Pancreatoduodenectomy Incisal margin
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O, et al. Cancer statistics, 2011 : the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths[ J]. CA Cancer J Clin,2011,61 (4) :212- 236.
  • 2Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, et al. 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single- institution experience [ J ~]. J Gastrointest Sarg,2006,10 ( 9 ) : 1199- 1211.
  • 3Westgaard A, Tafjord S, Farstad IN, et al. Resectable adenoearcinomas in the pancreatic head : the retroperitoneal resection margin is an independent prognostic factor [ J ]. BMC Cancer,2008,8:5.
  • 4Raut CP, Tseng JF, Sun CC, et al. Impact of resection status on pattern of failure and survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma [ J 1. Ann Surg, 2007,246 ( 1 ) : 52 -60.
  • 5Hatzaras I, George N, Muscarella P, et al. Predictors of survival in periampullary cancers following pancreaticoduodenectomy [ J ]. Ann Surg Oncol,2010,17(4) :991-997.
  • 6National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Version 1. 2013.
  • 7NCCN. org. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual [ M ]. 7 th edn. New York : Springer, 2010.
  • 8Campbell F, Bennett M, Foulis AJ. Minimum dataset for the histopathological reporting of pancreatic, ampulla of Vater and bile duct carcinoma [ M ]. London : Royal College of Patholozists.2002.
  • 9彭颖,修典荣,石雪迎,苏静,马朝来,蒋斌,原春辉,李磊,陶明,贾易木.标准化和非标准化处理胰头癌切除标本的临床研究[J].中华普通外科杂志,2014,29(5):329-333. 被引量:2
  • 10Verbeke CS. Resection margins and R1 rates in pancreatic cancer- are we there yet? [J]. Histopathology,2008,52(7) :787-796.

二级参考文献15

  • 1Verbeke CS. Resection margins and R1 rates in pancreatic are we there yet? [ J]. Histopathology, 2008, 52 (7) :787-796.
  • 2Esposito I, Kleeff J, Bergmann F, et al. Most pancreatic cancer resections are R1 resections [J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2008, 15 (6) :1651-1660.
  • 3Verbeke CS, Leitch D, Menon KV, et al. Redefining the R1 resection in pancreatic cancer[ J]. Br J Surg, 2006, 93 (10) : 1232-1237.
  • 4Rant CP, Tseng JF, Sun CC, et al. Impact of resection status on pattern of failure and survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma [ J ]. Ann Surg, 2007, 246 ( 1 ) :52- 60.
  • 5Sugiura T, Uesaka K, Mihara K, et al. Margin status, recurrence pattern, and prognosis after resection of pancreatic cancer [ J ]. Surgery, 2013, 154(5) :1078-1086.
  • 6Verbeke CS, Gladhaug IP. Resection margin involvement and tumour origin in pancreatic head cancer [ J ]. Br J Surg, 2012, 99 (8) : 1036-1049.
  • 7Verbeke CS. Resection margins in pancreatic cancer [ J ]. Surg Clin North Am. 2013, 93(3) :647-662.
  • 8Jamieson NB, Foulis AK, Oien KA, et al. Positive mobilization margins alone do not influence survival following pancreatico- duodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [ J ]. Ann Surg, 2010, 251 (6) :1003-1010.
  • 9Gaedcke J, Gunawan B, Grade M, et al. The mesopancreas is the primary site for R1 resection in pancreatic head cancer: relevance for clinical trials[ J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2010, 395(4) :451-458.
  • 10Janot MS, Kersting S, Belyaev O, et al. Can the new RCP R0/ R1 classification predict the clinical outcome in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head? [ J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2012, 397(6) :917-925.

共引文献1

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部